The value of the investment could be unpredictable when the investment is volatile. To add up, the fluctuation patterns of the value could be a lot different than it should be. It can be observed in a graph that the curve just suddenly rises and falls covering only a smaller amount of time.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Using the Gordon Growth Model, we can adequately demonstrate that the dividend and price of a share are both components of the cashflow to be considered in share valuation.
Price per share is found to be D(1) / (r - g)
where:
Do = Dividend now
D1 = Dividend in year 1
g = growth
r = required return
So we see that the market price of a share which determines the market capitalization of a company is predicted by a growth in dividends. So the benefits of holding a share will not only depend on how much the share is sold now as against how much it can be sold in the future (in order to make a gain), but also how much you can be earning until such sale occurs.
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. make an accurate diagnosis of what is causing the problem
Explanation:
The manager of the fast-food restaurant should understand the underlying problem first. Working on the assumption that it's because of a competitor marketing campaign may not give the desired results. A customer's preference may change due to many reasons.
The manager should make an accurate diagnosis of the problem first. With a precise reason as to why customers as fleeing, then he can develop a counter-strategy. Retaining the current member of the crew will not reverse the situation. Reducing prices may affect profitability, which is not the desired result. With low prices, some customers may question the quality of the breakfast.
