To start with, I've seen Samantha and Samandhi. And Samadhi Sutta, which interestingly discusses tranquillity and insight ( samatha and vipassana ).
There's another sutta which says that samatha and vipassana are paired qualities - samatha gets rid of passion, vipassana gets rid of delusion ( I'll see if I can find it ). Note that samatha is a quality, not a method.
Answer:
Explanation:
Water pollution in Canada is generally local and regional in water-rich Canada, and most Canadians have "access to sufficient, affordable, and safe drinking water and adequate sanitation." Water pollution in Canada is caused by municipal sewage, urban runoff, industrial pollution and industrial waste.
The nurse define and document this finding would be 1+ edema perceptible swelling of the leg. Thus, the option (d) is correct.
What is swelling?
The terms swelling describes the body part's abnormality. An accumulation of fluid is what causes swelling in the body. Edema is a condition where the tissues around a joint expand, most commonly on the ankle or knee.
The edema accumulates, fluid can build up. On the leg, the nurse would press the skin's surface with their thumbs. It had an extremely smooth surface. No observable swelling of the limb, edema 1+, modest pitting, and slight indentation.
As a result, the nurse edema 1+ no perceptible swelling of the leg. Therefore, the option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on swelling, here:
brainly.com/question/7328644
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
a. 3+ edema
b. 4+ edema
c. 2+ edema
d. 1+ edema
"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
