<em>Explanation:</em>
There is a famous answer by <em><u>Swami Vivekananda</u></em> to a question "<em>What is poison?"</em> he answered "<em>anything excessive is poison</em>"
Nature has made the structure of all living beings different and their needs are also different.You cannot eat as much food as an elephant and you cannot survive by eating as minimum as an ant. Neither extremely low nor extremely high, balanced is best!
Even if the wrong person gets extreme knowledge than necessary, then he can cause unrest in the society due to its misuse.
Daily life use of wood is natural, but we trampled the forests to meet our illegitimate needs. The consequences of which are being seen in the environment today.
extreme use of AC, cooler, plastic etc increased the global warming that lead to 1.5°C rise in temperature in March 2022 which breaks the record of past one century.
To fullfill our desire and to get served meat in our food, alot of birds and animals are being slaughtered in extreme amount, You may surprise after knowing the meat consumption and excessive use of dairy products are secondary cause of green house effect.
Extreme use of social media have made out youth physically and mentally damaged.
All we need to create balance and peace in life extreme is always harmful there are alot more examples are there which we can clearly see in our daily life.
<em><u>Thanks for joining brainly </u></em><em><u>community!</u></em>
A. a law of requiring bike helmets.
The answer is: b. States have intangible boundaries.
A state boundaries is considered to be 'intangible' if they do not possess a physical form that clearly separate one area with the other. Currently, the most states in united states have a physical structure or natural objects (such as forests or mountain) that they use as a sign that separate their territories.
I believe that is the first continental congress
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory that seeks to understand the foundations of ethics and morals from the consequences of actions.
In this case, utilitarianism is the idea that an action can only be considered morally correct if its consequences promote collective well-being. If the outcome of the action is negative for most, it is classified as morally reprehensible. That is, according to utilitarianism, rules should not be taken on the basis of the greatest utility, but should be established on the basis of the social welfare that these rules will provide to society.
From this reasoning, utilitarianism presents itself as opposed to selfishness, since the consequences of actions must be focused on the happiness of a set and not on particular and individual interests.
