1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnyKZ [126]
1 year ago
10

How the Bill of Rights protects the citizens ?​

Law
1 answer:
Vitek1552 [10]1 year ago
5 0

The bill of Rights consists of 10 amendments that explicitly assure certain rights and protections to US citizens by limiting the energy of the federal government. the primary change prevents the authorities from interfering with the freedoms of speech, peaceful meetings, and exercising of faith.

The bill of Rights protects all people, including undocumented immigrants, to exercise free speech, faith, and assembly, and to be unfastened from illegal government interference.

The bill of Rights is critical, not handiest in the freedoms it protects however in its demonstration of the united states enduring dedication to self-development and striving to constantly shape a greater best union. on the grounds that additional Amendments were ratified for a complete of 27 Amendments to the constitution.

kingdom bills of rights supplied no safety from oppressive acts of the federal authorities due to the fact the constitution, treaties and laws made in pursuance of the constitution were declared to be the excellent law of the land.

Learn more about the Bill of Rights here:-brainly.com/question/493206

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
(Gradpoint forensic Science 2 unit 1 drug evidence quiz) please
Serhud [2]

Answer:

This test uses formaldehyde and sulfuric acid. The solution will turn purple when introduced to heroin, morphine, or other opium drugs.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Based on the data in the two tables, which statements are accurate? Check all that apply.
VikaD [51]

Answer:

A. Voters who were college graduates were more likely to support Clinton than Trump.

E. High income voters making over 100k were divided in their support for Clinton and Trump.

Explanation:

edge

3 0
3 years ago
1. Where is the line drawn between religion and public schools?
Over [174]

Answer:

religion is something you learn about but you can not share your beliefs with the school and teachers aren't allowed to preach their religions.

some schools allow prayer in sports but it is not a mandatory thing.

I still believe that it is not a good thing to put religion beliefs and school together because then if u don't believe in someone elses religion it can cause problems which will revolve in exclusion and fights about religion.

It depends on what it is used for and if they are making it a mandatory thing or not.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Under sfac no.6, interrelated elements of financial statements that are directly related to measuring the performance and status
maria [59]

Answer and Explanation:

False

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When your driver license is _____, it's considered void and terminated. A. expunged B. suspended C. canceled D. renewed
    12·2 answers
  • Imagine that you are a delegate at the Constitutional Convention. You need to give a short speech for
    8·1 answer
  • Organizaciones SIN fines de lucro
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Supreme Court's justification for overturning the separate-but-equal doctrine?
    10·1 answer
  • Please help word cross puzzle
    13·2 answers
  • Can you cry under water?
    5·2 answers
  • Under Miranda vs. Arizona, police must advise suspects of all but which of the following rights:
    7·1 answer
  • Plea bargains typically do nothing to help manage the caseload and resources for the court. Question 10 options: True False
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a defensive driving technique to manage space zones
    13·1 answer
  • courts normally follow the rule of stare decisis when deciding cases. there are times, however, as in state v. witt, a new jerse
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!