Answer:
It should be left to state control because, its at a state level. a state level such as your local police , fire fighters , mayors etc. if it was brought to national control it would be chaos as national control is every state in the US.
sorry im kinda busy so i cant answer as good as i want to but it should be left to state control.
Answer:
The signs reference the role of the government in protecting the natural rights of the people.
Explanation:
Taking into consideration the signs that the protesters carry, their demands seem to be regarding the safety and security of the rights of not only the people but also that of the whole planet, including the planets and animals. The reference to "Life, Liberty, and Property" in their protest also suggest their intention of demanding for the protection of the whole planet including Mother Earth.
And so, with these signs, the protesters utilizes the Declaration of Independence in emphasizing their demands of the natural rights of the people. The demand that the people have the right to have a livable planet and be safe is an undeniable right. that With the Declaration a part of their reference, they are alluding to the role of the government in ensuring the protection of the people's natural rights.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
If an environmental law is in place were a business wants to put there factories up they won’t be aloud to . For example if there is an endangered species living there and Publix wants to build a store there they will not be aloud to .
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"
I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.
For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.
Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.