1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inga [223]
2 years ago
14

Which of the following statements accurately describes the relationship between the principle of "separation of powers" and the

Articles of Confederation?
a.Because the Articles of Confederation created a bicameral legislative branch that could make and enforce its laws, it clearly illustrates the principle of "separation of powers".

b.The Articles of Confederation created both a legislative branch and an executive branch, making this document a clear illustration of the principle of "separation of powers".

c.Because the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle of "separation of powers".

d.The Articles of Confederation created only a judicial branch that could interpret matters of law for the states, therefore it is a poor example of the principle of "separation of powers".
Law
2 answers:
vredina [299]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

c.Because the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle of "separation of powers".

Lostsunrise [7]2 years ago
4 0
The answer is c stupid 20 min
You might be interested in
1} What is the difference between civil law and criminal Law?
Art [367]

Answer:

Civil law refers to law governing disputes between private parties. In civil cases, the plaintiff sues the defendant to obtain compensation for some wrong that the defendant has allegedly done the plaintiff.Criminal Law

It’s a crime to make unauthorized and harmful physical contact with another person (battery). In fact, it’s a crime even to threaten such contact (assault). Criminal law prohibits and punishes wrongful conduct, such as assault and battery, murder, robbery, extortion, and fraud. In criminal cases, the plaintiff—the party filing the complaint—is usually a government body acting as a representative of society.

Explanation:

I have no explanation sorry I hope this was helpful

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If his hair is 14 cm long and hair grows approximately 1.3 cm per month, will there still be evidence of drug use in his hair?
Crazy boy [7]

it is possible since hair doesn't readily decompose. If the rate of hair growth is 1.3 cm per month and his hair is 14 cm long, then it means that the test can still trace a drug that was ingested 11 months ago

7 0
3 years ago
Keeping in mind the constitutional war powers of Congress and the President, how would you assess the
Goryan [66]

Answer:

"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Expressed powers are those that are
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Individual rights must be balanced against the values of society at large. For instance, the right to free speech must be balanc
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement describes Max Weber's theory about power?
    12·2 answers
  • This was an act of continental congress which initially organized the first united states territory and was to be the basis for
    6·1 answer
  • Watch a portion of the Chauvin Murder Trial. Summarize and describe the verbal and nonverbal actions of the courtroom participan
    10·1 answer
  • A defendant must testify at trial if asked to come to the stand.<br><br><br> False<br><br> True
    10·2 answers
  • "Genericide" applies to ______<br>trademarks<br>patents​
    7·1 answer
  • Please list or give three real life police brutality incidents in recent times (2019-2021)?
    15·1 answer
  • 29. Motorcyclists must make a bigger<br> adjustment in speed than other drivers<br> when
    12·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Ccolor%7Bred%7D%7B%20%5Crm%7BIM%20%20%5C%3A%20SO%20%20%5C%3A%20BORED%20%20%20%7D%7D" id="
    7·2 answers
  • the national labor relations act requires employers and unions to deal in good faith in collective bargaining. true or false?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!