1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jet001 [13]
3 years ago
8

Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel. At the last minute, her plans changed making it impossible for her to travel. S

he called her sister, Ravinder, and suggested that she make use of the room in her place. When Ravinder arrived at the motel, she was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it. Was the motel within its rights to refuse her admittance? Why or why not?
Law
1 answer:
Yakvenalex [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.

We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.

Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.

You might be interested in
Do you believe that the law is totally fair and justified for everyone? Explain.
Serga [27]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

look at me I'm in jail

5 0
3 years ago
There is no objective 'truth' in morality." – do you agree or disagree? Why or Why not? (Write your answer between 200-250 words
Sladkaya [172]

Answer:

This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.

Explanation:

I agree.

What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.

There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.

Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.

That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is not, according to your text, a
melomori [17]

Answer: B

Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is considered as innovative criminal defense strategy?
Likurg_2 [28]

Considering the available options, the choice that is considered as an innovative criminal defense strategy is "<u>battered women's syndrome."</u>

<h3>What is battered women's syndrome?</h3>

Battered women's syndrome is a medical and psychological term that is used to describe the severe mental health ailment resulting from serious domestic abuse.

Given the legal situation, battered women's syndrome is not a typical condition that is common but has been innovated by some defenders to justify their offense so they can get discharged and acquitted.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Battered women's syndrome.</u>

Learn more about the criminal defense strategy here: brainly.com/question/11342133

5 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making
castortr0y [4]

<u>Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below: </u>

  • The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
  • The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
  • They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
  • The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who served as president of the convention? Who is known as the “Father of the U.S. Constitution”? Why did he earn his name?
    5·1 answer
  • Help! Will mark brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • Select the three tasks performed by a forensic science technician.
    14·1 answer
  • When a company goes public, it begins doing what?
    13·1 answer
  • East Coast Furniture is considering submitting a proposal for a $50,000
    7·1 answer
  • What is the importance of discharging once responsibilities?​
    7·1 answer
  • In the context of types of corruption in police departments, which of the following
    12·1 answer
  • What is a Criminal Case? List two examples
    10·2 answers
  • I dunno but read this : THIS IS FOR YOUR SAFETY, PLEASE READ! ⚠️ There is a Mickey Mouse profile that will dm (direct message) y
    12·2 answers
  • What is the main difference between settler colonies and peasant colonies?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!