1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helen [10]
3 years ago
6

Robert very much wants to hire Jacqueline because she is African American and Beck ‘n’ Call does not have a large enough number

of minority employees. If Robert follows through with hiring Jacqueline using this reason as his primary justification, this preferential treatment of Jacqueline would violate the ___________
Law
1 answer:
suter [353]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Civil acts right of 1991

Explanation:

The civil acts right enforces laws to prevent unfair treatment during employment and on the job due to sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age. Passed by Congress in 1991, this act advocates for fairness in employment matters and banned discrimination against the disabled in employment.

This preferential treatment of Jacqueline by Robert because she is African American goes against the 1991 civil act right.

You might be interested in
1 point
Andrews [41]

answer 15

because if the person Walked For three hours then it's 5×3 =15

hope I helped

7 0
2 years ago
does anyone have PLATO Course Principles of Law, Public Safety, Corrections, and Security, Semester A i need help on the third s
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Whats your question?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
the offspring between a tall plant and a short pea plant produces all tall offspring then tallness is most likely
Anvisha [2.4K]
Tallness is most likely a dominant gene
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v.Alvarado? Write a short paragraph describing y
goblinko [34]
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the others are already answered

Explanation:

For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is the use of symbols related to culture?
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the plan of target at columbine
    8·1 answer
  • Jonathan Simpson owns a construction company. One day a subcontractor calls him, saying that he needs a replacement check for th
    15·1 answer
  • To become a judge in a state court in most states requires which of the following? (Select all that apply.)
    5·2 answers
  • 55 PTS!
    6·2 answers
  • Which crime is classified as a misdemeanor?<br> O assault<br> O burglary<br> O murder<br> O speeding
    13·2 answers
  • F points just answer this 12/56 888
    7·2 answers
  • This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please ♡♡
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!