Answer:
Conspicuous consumption
Explanation:
Conspicuous consumption is a term used to describe expenditures on goods and services purchased primarily for the purpose of showing wealth. In the mind of the conspicuous consumer, such display serves as a means of having or maintaining social status before a social group, which socially determines objects and goods, such as a classification of higher or lower status. An example of this can be seen in the question above, where the girl bought a very expensive purse just to show that she possessed something luxurious and give an impression of wealth.
Answer:
The answer is Short-term Memory
Explanation:Short-term memory (or "primary" or "active memory") is the capacity for holding, but not manipulating, a small amount of information in mind in an active, readily available state for a short period of time.The duration of short-term memory (when rehearsal or active maintenance is prevented) is believed to be in the order of seconds.
Answer:
Prejudice
Explanation:
A prejudice is what we form about other people without really knowing them. That means that Brittany's idea about people with long hair was a prejudice, because she didn't know anybody who had that feature. When she happened to know somebody, she confirmed her prejudice.
Kelebihan Kereta Elektrik. Tidak Perlu Gas. Lebih mudah. Penjimatan. Tiada Pelepasan. Populariti. Selamat Memandu. In English Advantages of an Electric Car. No Gas Required. More Convenient. Savings. No Emissions. Popularity. Safe to Drive
People often make different comments. Reagan says that Carter has misrepresented the evidence because he has not provided context on government spending in California.
<h3>What is misrepresentation of evidence?</h3>
The act of Proving misrepresentation shows or depicts the burden of proof that has been laid on the plaintiff to provide some key evidence that the defendant misrepresented the said information which has some major of damage on the plaintiff or has caused him some major of loss.
Reagan believes that Carter has misrepresented the evidence due to the fact that he has not given any form of context on government spending done in California.
Learn more about misrepresentation from
brainly.com/question/5792449
