Answer:
(a) $33750000 (b) $11250000 (c) $22500000
Explanation:
Solution
(a) How much would Ziegler Inc. total income of operating increase.
Now,
Units * (Cost of purchased from outside supplier - Variable cost)
Thus,
75000 * ($1350 - $900) = $33750000
(b) How much would the Instrument Division's operating income increase
Now,
The Units * (Cost of purchased from outside supplier - Transfer Price)
So,
75000 units * ($1350 - $1200) = $11250000
(C) How much would the Components Division's operating income increase?
Now,
Units * (Transfer Price - Variable cost)
75000 units * ($1200 - $900) = $22500000
According to Adam Smith and other classical economists, why is the economic theory supporting market economies (or capitalism<span>) </span>much more realistic than theories supporting command economies<span>? ... Americans prefer to have the </span>market<span>, rather </span>than<span> the government, to manage their </span>economy<span>.</span>
When surplus <span>funds are set aside (idling the excess) and the government does not spend the money nor apply it to past debt, this action does not cause expansion or contraction.
That statement is true. Expansion or contraction happens when the amount of Government budget is accumulated or decreased as the result of last year's operations</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
It would be the Banking act of 1933; made so that banks would be unable to invest their money so that people would have more faith in them.
