All categories

1 year ago

List six presumptive signs of death that should be identified when dealing with a patient who has a do not resuscitate order.

1 answer:

3 0

The six presumptive signs of death that should be identified when dealing with a patient who has a do not resuscitate order are:

An unresponsive to painful stimuli
A lack of a carotid pulse or heartbeat,
The absence of breath sounds,
When there is deep tendon or corneal reflexes,
When there is no eye movement,
When there is systolic blood pressure.

<h3>What does it mean to resuscitate a patient?</h3>

The term is known to be the act where a doctor is said to be bringing back from any form of death or unconsciousness.

The six presumptive signs of death that should be identified when dealing with a patient who has a do not resuscitate order.

An unresponsive to painful stimuli
A lack of a carotid pulse or heartbeat,
The absence of breath sounds,
When there is deep tendon or corneal reflexes,
When there is no eye movement,
When there is systolic blood pressure.

Learn more about resuscitate order from

brainly.com/question/15583204

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Individuals who have high self-esteem are most likely to

Scrat [10]

The correct answer to this question is letter "c. worry about what others think about them." Individuals who have high self-esteem are most likely to <span>worry about what others think about them. They tend to be worried about their reputation and they must uphold it.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

Introduce energy and mentions it's source

katrin [286]

Answer:

Energy is the capacity of a physical system to perform work. Energy exists in several forms such as heat , kinetic or mechanical energy, light, potential energy , electrical, or other forms.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

List and describe five important rights protected by the Fifth Amendment. Then choose one of these rights and briefly explain wh

NeX [460]

Answer:

The fifth amendment protects the following rights of each Citizen in the US.As it made it very easy for the system, as well for all the individuals to deal with the criminal trials and protection of ones possession inside the US.

Not to punish any person twice on the bases of the same charges filed against them before or for the same offence made by the criminal(A prohibition on double jeopardy).
As no one can be termed as criminal before he or she faces the grand jury or the court (Right to indictment by the grand jury before any criminal charges for felonious crimes).
While a person is under trial he can't be forced to provide any evidence to help the system to prosecute the same person in a any case, as he can willingly provide some material or evidence only upon his will(A right against forced self-incrimination).
Each individual who is facing some legal issues and is faced by the court or the system inside the US will be granted the right to go through a procedure of trial.As no one can be termed as criminal unless there are any number of true evidence or proofs been presented in the court(A guarantee that all criminal defendants have a fair trial).
The System or The Government of the United States can't confiscate any citizen's property or land (possession of that individual), without the well of that individual. It can only be able to do so after both the parties agree on a set of terms. As the government is required to pay the required amount of money as per the market ( a guarantee that government cannot seize private property without making a due compensation at the market value of the property).

Explanation:

<u>" A guarantee that all criminal defendants have a fair trial":</u>

Logically it is also very unfair and inhumane to term any individual as a criminal with out having any trial set for that person. As a person can be punished or termed as a criminal by the system on proving the charges filed against him or her. As the individual will be required pass from a series of trials, after which if proved guilty by the grand jury and the court, he will be punished or simply jailed. Or else he will leave as an innocent.

As before the fifth amendment was proposed and after it accepted to be included as a part of the constitution, there were some cases which were dealt in a very unfair way so, many of accusations were just baseless and with out having any trial for any accused, the system was able to term him as a criminal. As it was an ill treatment of the accused which led many to serve jail and more punishment in the early years.

7 0

3 years ago

Which physical feature has often served as a barrier for trade and travel in East Asia?

max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

The Himalayas

Explanation:

The huge mountains kept people from trading

5 0

2 years ago

What promise did the members of the third estate make in signing the tennis court oath? did they achieve their goal? explain you

s2008m [1.1K]

The promise made is, In these modest surroundings, they took the historic Tennis Court Oath, with which they agreed not to disband until a new French constitution had been adopted

On June 20, 1789, members of the French Third Estate took the Tennis Court Oath (French: Serment du Jeu de Paume) at the tennis court built for the Palace of Versailles in 1686. [1] Their vow to "do not separate and meet again as needed until the Constitution of the Kingdom is settled" [1] became an important event of the French Revolution.

The Estates General was convened to deal with the national financial and agricultural crises, but shortly after the convocation in May 1789, especially by order or by the head (reducing third power), I got stuck on a typical problem. Real estate, much more than the other two real estates). On June 17, the Third Estate became known as the Parliament, led by Onore Gabriel Riqueti and Comte de Mirabeau.

Learn more about Oath here: brainly.com/question/1809645

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago