Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
The purpose of the "Little Albert" <span>psychology experiment</span><span> was to show empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans.</span><span>
The famous ''Little Albert'' study conducted by John Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrated that: </span>that it was possible to condition an emotional reaction to a previously neutral stimulus.
Answer:
Abnormal level of dopamine
Explanation:
Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that is found in the brain. It is responsible for functioning in the brain. It is made by the body and uses my brain. It is also called a chemical messenger. Dopamine play a crucial a role in how we feel pleasure. It is a big part of the brain that play a role in thinking and feeling of the brain.
Functions
- Learning
- Motivation
- Heart rate
- Breathing
- Lactation
- Sleep
- Mood
- Attention
Thus in the above statement both the man have an abnormal level of dopamine was there in the body.
