1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
1 year ago
14

Assume that Botswana Life Insurance (BOTS LIFE) pays no cash dividends currently and is not expected to for the next 5 years. It

s latest EPS was $10, all of which was reinvested in the company. The firm’s expected ROE for the next 5 years is 20% per year, and during this time, it is expected to continue to reinvest all of its earnings. Starting 6 years from now the firm’s ROE on new investment is expected to fall to 15% and the company is expected to start paying out 40% of its earning in cash dividends, which it will continue to do forever after. BOTS LIFE’s market capitalisation rate is 15% per year.
(a) Estimate the intrinsic value per share of the firm [7 Marks]
(b) Assuming its current market price is equal to its intrinsic value, using illustrations, what do you expect to happen to its price over the next year and the year after? [5 Marks]
(c) Illustrate, what effect would it have on your estimate of the intrinsic value if BOTS LIFE is expected to pay out only 20% of earnings starting in year 6? [5 Marks
Business
1 answer:
Advocard [28]1 year ago
6 0

The intrinsic value of company's share is $89.90

The share price is expected to rise in the incoming years

The intrinsic value of share remains the same when payout ratio reduces to 20%

What is the firm growth rate in each of the future years?

The growth rate of the company, which is also the growth rate for earnings per share in each of the first 5 years

Growth rate in the first 5 years=ROE*reinvestment rate

ROE=20%

reinvestment rate=100%(all earnings would be reinvested)

Growth rate in the first 5 years=100%*20%

Growth rate in the first 5 years=20%

Earnings in 5 years=current EPS*(1+growth rate)^5

Earnings in 5 years=$10*(1+20%)^5

Earnings in 5 years=$24.8832

Growth rate for year 6 and beyond=15%*(1-40%)

Growth rate for year 6 and beyond=9.00%

Earnings in year 6=$24.8832*(1+9%)

earnings in year 6=$27.122688

Out of the EPS, 40% would be paid as dividends

dividends in year 6=$27.122688*40%

dividends in year 6=$10.8490752

We can compute the share price at the end of year using the present value formula of perpetuity

share price in year 5=$10.8490752/(15%-9%)

share price in year 5=$180.81792

share price now=$180.81792/(1+15%)^5

share price now=$89.90

The fact that share price and the intrinsic value are the same implies that share price would increase over the next year and the year after because the dividends would continue to growth at a constant rate of 9%

Out of the EPS, 20% would be paid as dividends

dividends in year 6=$27.122688*20%

dividends in year 6=$5.4245376

growth rate=15%*(1-20%)=12.00%

We can compute the share price at the end of year using the present value formula of perpetuity

share price in year 5=$5.4245376/(15%-12%)

share price in year 5=$180.81792

share price now=$180.81792/(1+15%)^5

share price now=$89.90

The share price in payout ratio from 40% to 20% has no effect on the intrinsic value since the share prices are the same under the two scenarios

Find out more about intrinsic value on:brainly.com/question/14720349

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

MIRR -16.50%

They should reject the project is it destroys capital it do not meet to pay up the cost of the investment.

A typical firm’s IRR will be greater than its MIR

If the project yields higher than the cost of capital the IRR will be higher than the MIRR as reinvest the cashflow at the project yield rather than copany's cost of capital, thus it overstate the return.

Explanation:

MIRR = \sqrt{\frac{FV \: inflow}{PV \: outflow}} -1

WACC (cost of capital, reinvestment and financiation rate) = 7%

<em>Cash inflow:</em>

Inflow \: (1+ r)^{time} = Amount

Year 1 275000    336,886.825

Year 3 450000     481500

Year 4 450000    450000

Total                        1,268,386.825

<em>Cash outflow:</em>

F=                           -2,500,000

Year 2 -125000 -    109, 179.841

\frac{125,000}{(1 + 0.07)^{2} } = PV  

Total                    2,609,179.841

Now we can solve for MIRR:

MIRR = \sqrt[n]{\frac{FV \: inflow}{PV \: outflow}} -1

MIRR = \sqrt[4]{\frac{1,268,386.82}{2,609,179.84}} -1

MIRR - 16.49991% = -16.50%

6 0
3 years ago
Monthly sales are​ $530,000. Warranty costs are estimated at​ 5% of monthly sales. Warranties are honored with replacement produ
sashaice [31]

Answer:

C. Estimated warranty payable for $26,500.

Explanation:

The monthly sales are $530,000 and the warranty costs are 5% of monthly sales,

Therefore, Warranty costs will be = $530,000*5% = $26,500.

Now, we know that no defective products were returned during the current month, hence the other options in the questions are discarded and Estimated warranty payable is taken at the month end.

Thank buddy.

Good luck and Cheers.

8 0
3 years ago
MNM &amp; Co incurred depreciation expenses of $36,810 last year. The sales were $903,480 and the addition to retained earnings
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

The costs incurred by the company is the same as the costs of good sold  of the company-MNM&Co ,last year.

The costs of good sold=$830,556.01

Explanation:

The detailed computation is found in the excel file attached.

Download xlsx
3 0
3 years ago
1. The government is mulling protecting the shoe industry. It estimates it needs to protect it for 6 years to the tune of $5 bil
faust18 [17]

Answer:

PV of cash outflows = Annuity*(1-1/(1+rate)^number of terms)/rate

= 5000000000*(1-1/(1+9%)^6)/9%

= 22429592951.15

PV of inflows at end of 6 years= Annuity*(1-1/(1+rate)^number of terms)/rate

= 200000000*(1-1/(1+9%)^100)/9%

= 2221820304.00

PV of inflows now = 2221820304/1.09^6 = $1,324,798,853.47

NPV = -22429592951.15+1324798853.47

= -21104794098

We see that the Net Present value added by this method is negative. Hence the project is not beneficial.

5 0
3 years ago
The net profit or loss for a particular period of time is reported on the
Vika [28.1K]
I would fill that as: "The net profit or loss for a particular period of time is reported on the Income statement".


I hope it helped you!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following did not result in economic growth? Many citizens emigrating from Zimbabwe when a politically repressive r
    7·1 answer
  • Mr. divers retired last year with a small pension. he also has a mutual fund account made entirely up of stable fixed-rate bonds
    7·1 answer
  • The phase of the business cycle where the economy is growing faster than usual is called
    14·1 answer
  • A bill in the House of Representatives may only be introduced by a(n) __________. employee of a federal agency lobbyist for a sp
    6·2 answers
  • Miguel is doing a research paper on new york city's stonewall riots of 1969. he visits the scene of the riots, interviews people
    6·1 answer
  • Why do housing lenders charge more interest up front?
    11·1 answer
  • Enterprise Free Cash Flows should include which of the following: I. Capital expenditures II. Financing costs III. Taxes IV. Wor
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose the demand for macaroni is inelastic, the supply of macaroni is elastic, the demand for cigarettes is inelastic, and the
    8·1 answer
  • The external competitiveness of an organization's pay relative to elsewhere in the industry is measured by its ________. Group o
    5·1 answer
  • What is a good camera for vlogging?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!