Answer:
All The Above
Explanation:
Articles of confederation initially made to create a form of government that give the power to the local rather than central government. At that time, we just got our freedom from the British Empire and the founding fathers swore to create a government that does not give power to small groups of nobles such as the monarchy.
So huge responsibilities such as Taxing citizens and Regulate trade was given to the states rather than the national government.
'Require states to contribute money to the national government
' ,and could 'not Pass a law unless nine of the 13 states agreed' also made as a form of protection to the states. This rule was created to make sure that the national government could not coerce the states to conform to their will.
Answer: Reducing the use of forest resources can enable humans to make it last longer.
Explanation: A reduction of the use of forest resources can help with the mitigation process. Mitigation can be defined as the reduction of the loss during any natural disaster. Forest is a rich source of oxygen, so we have to be very careful about the conservation of forest resources. It also serves numerous others functions like it can be use as shelter for different animals and birds. We have to minimize the uses of forest products.
Answer:
Impersonality
Explanation:
Impersonality and personal difference is a characteristic of bureaucracy where an individual is hired on the ability to deliver and not solely on their personal traits or attributes.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter b. social loafing.
Explanation:
In social psychology, the term social loafing describes a phenomenon that takes place when individuals work in a group instead of on their own. Social loafing is the tendency people show to exert less effort when working with others. This phenomenon explains why sometimes groups are less efficient and less productive than if the individuals were to work on their own and be responsible for their own productivity. That is the case with Michelle. Now that the group is larger, she is making less effort, being "content to sit back and let others do the work".
Answer:
It is not reasonable to say there is a correlation because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be athird variable (lurking variable) that may have a better explanation for the correlation.
Explanation:
Is it not reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be a third variable that may have a better explanation for the correlation and it might as well means that the third-lurking variable affects the correlation; for example, those cars that are most frequently reported stolen may simply be the cars that are more commonly sold because they are cheaper than the cars that are stolen least often, and thus have a higher chance of being exposed to thieves.
