Answer:
i forget the answer sorry
In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford's argument was based on the Missouri Compromise.
Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
What affect did their interaction have on colonization? ... most affected the dynamics of European and indigenous American relationships. ... San Augustín remained a small outpost throughout the Spanish colonial period; a sort of multicultural
Explanation:
Answer: it was probably the most important black revolutionary leader in Americas, revolutionnary leader in Haiti (French colony). This leader of Haitian revolution became later governor of Saint Domingue (name of Haiti at that time).
Explanation: in Haiti revolution started in 1791 and was initiated as a consequence of revolutionary movement in France. Touissant L´Ouverture was in the head of revolutionary movement already at that time. The revolution was not only against French imperialism but it was also revolution of blacks against their white "seigneurs"
