Answer:
7. $41,000
Explanation:
7. The company has $40,000 of inventory on December, it further purchased $36,000 of inventory in January. The sales in January amounted to $50,000 out of which 30% is gross profit. The cost of goods sold will be $35,000. The inventory that is destroyed by fire $41,000 ($40,000 + $36,000 - $35,000 ).
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": innovative.
Explanation:
Innovative changes allow companies to use new strategies and technologies to improve the efficiency of their operations. Sometimes those changes are processes or technological devices created by the company itself while in other cases they are adopted from other entities with similar approaches and accomplish almost the same goal.
Answer:
B) high trust zero-sum reward practice
Explanation:
Zero sum reward practices are generally not that successful since usually only a few are benefited while several people are left out of the benefits, or lose. If someone gains a benefit at the expense of others, it will always cause friction within the organization. That friction can lead to illegitimate political behavior, which is behavior that breaks implied rules. The regular "losers" in zero sum reward practices may be tempted to break the rules or cheat in order to obtain the benefits.
For example, if the same person is always selected as the employee of the month, his/her "losing" coworkers may start to sabotage his/her work.
Standardization and innovation play critical roles in the development of goods and services. Standardization allows for a stabilized starting point in which to move forward and develop other goods and services which is related to innovation. Standardization provides stability, a known factor which can be relied upon, whereas innovation is riskier and may not come to be successful endeavor. However, like all risk, that is the payoff for the investment in innovation, for if the innovative good or service can be successfully brought to market, the dividends for a payout can be well worth it.
<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
