Answer: Give short responses, as they are more effective.
i really wouldn't try to use any of these choices though. I would really like to get the audience's attention so I would answer there questions but I would also ask the audience what they think I should do to improve via presentation to the audience to peak their interest.
Explanation: None of these are really a good strategy for interacting with the audience in an effective way, but if this is the only thing provided for you, I would go for giving short responses.
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Finerly should recognize $0 of revenue upon delivery to distributors. Because of the uncertainty of the returns due to the fact that Finerly does not know if it will have to accept the cosmetics back from the distributors if the cosmetics are not sold, Finerly cannot or should not recognize revenue until it either can estimate in a better way its returns or when the sales actually occur.
I believe the answer is: An Revocable Living Trust
Revocable living trust refers to a form of planning that help you determine the person who would obtain your properties when you die. A revocable living trust would cover three phases of the maker's life: his lifetime, possible incapacitation, and what happens after his death.
Answer: All three methods result in the same amount of total depreciation
Explanation:
Depreciation is when the value of an asset has been reduced because the asset has been used or due to wear and tear.
When considering total depreciation recorded over the entire life span of an asset, the method resulting in the highest total depreciation is the straight line method, the double declining balance method, and the activity method.
Therefore, option the answer will be that "all three methods result in the same amount of total depreciation". This is because the amount charged for depreciation can not exceed the cost involved and will be identical for the three methods
Answer:
b. 6 pairs of jeans per crate of olives; and
c. 4 pairs of jeans per crate of olives
Explanation:
Olives Jeans Trade off Ratio (Olives:Jeans)
Spain 1 3 1:3 or 0.33:1 (1/3 = 0.33)
Denmark 1 11 1:11 or 0.09:1 (1/11= 0.09)
Spain & Denmark have less opportunity cost & hence comparative advantage than each other, in Olive & Jeans respectively.
Spain will export Olives to Denmark (importer). Denmark will export Jeans to Spain (Importer). Trade will be gainful if they get exchange ratio better than domestic exchange ratio.
- '2 jeans pairs per olive crate' not gainful trade ratio for Spain, as it is getting more i.e 3 jeans pair per olive crate at its own domestic ratio.
- '13 jeans per olive' not gainful for Denmark, as 0.07 = (1/13) olive per jeans is worse than its own domestic ratio i.e 0.09 = (1/11) olive per jeans
'4 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 4 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.25 = (1/4) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
'6 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 6 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.16 = (1/6) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
Both of them are gainful trade ratios, but:
- 1olive:4 jeans is more gainful for Denmark, as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (0.25 is more > 0.09 than 4 > 3).
- 1olive:6jeans is more gainful for Spain as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (6 is more > 3 than 0.16 > 0.09)
