All categories

3 years ago

Which one is correct? A,B,C, or D?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Paladinen [302]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-7 <-4

Firstly solve this.

+7 +7

3x<3

÷3 ÷3

x<1

And because the inequality symbol isn't "equal to", the circle isn't coloured in.

The line will go from 1 to behind 0

DochEvi [55]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Everything below, not including, 1.

You might be interested in

Problem 2:

kifflom [539]

Answer:

The answers to the questions about problem 2 are:

The fraction of the length after Priya stops two times is 3/4.
The fraction of the length after Priya stops four times is 15/16.
Priya will never reach the end of the hallway.

Step-by-step explanation:

The explanation about each answer is below:

1. In the first stop, Priya has walked half of the total length, and there would still be half the hallway, however, when she stops the second time, she has walked the half of the half, I mean:

$\frac{1}{2}/2=\frac{1}{4}$

If you add the two values you obtain the total distance traveled by Priya:

$\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}= \frac{3}{4}$

And the distance traveled in two stops is 3/4 of the total length of the hallway.

2. With four stops the system is the same, we know with two stops Priya travels 3/4 of the hallway, now with the third stop, she will travel half of the remaining distance:

$\frac{1}{4}/2=\frac{1}{8}$

And in the fourth stop she will travel half of the remaining, I mean:

$\frac{1}{8}/2=\frac{1}{16}$

Now, we add all the values of the distances obtained:

$\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{16}= \frac{15}{16}$

So, the distance traveled by Priya in the fourth stop is 15/16 of the total length of the hallway.

3. How we know, the numbers are infinite, in the same forms the distances, by this reason, how the problem says that Priya walks just half of the distance, she will never reach the end because despite she has very near of the end, she will continue walking just half and ever smaller distances.

3 0

3 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

A bike was recently marked down $200.00 from its initial price. if you have a coupon for an additional 30% off after the markdow

love history [14]

Should be 525$ if I'm correct

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Stock in Globin Publishing costs $8.72 per share. Mary buys 105 shares of Globin Publishing, and her broker charges a commission

matrenka [14]

105 × $8.72 = $915.60
$915.60 + $348 = $1,263.60

Mary paid $1,263.60 for the stock.

8 0

3 years ago

(3 + 2i) - (5 -7i) Write answer in standard form a +bi

Bess [88]

(3 + 2i) - (5 - 7i)

Distribute the - sign

3 + 2i - 5 + 7i

Combine like terms

-2 + 9i

4 0

3 years ago