Disclosure versus anonymity is a critical issue that can be described as expecting group participants to make the choice to relinquish some of their controlled and rehearsed ways and allow themselves to respond more spontaneously to events of the moment.
Anonymity According to Marx (1999), anonymity represents a state in which a person cannot be identified. It is social in nature and requires "at least one audience" (p.100). Not surprisingly, there was much debate about its role in communication.
For example, anonymity has long been associated with personalization effects that can lead to uncontrollable behavior (Jessup, Connolly, & Garegher, 1990; Zimbardo, 1969). It is also associated with certain prosocial behaviors (Johnson & Downing, 1979; Zimbardo, 1969).
CMC is not the only means of communication that allows anonymity, but traditional forms of communication such as letters and telephones can also avoid identity verification. With computer technology, anonymity separates people in time and space.
Learn more about Disclosure versus anonymity here: brainly.com/question/1382377
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe it is shared.
Explanation:
Cause if there is a block party and people bring dishes and pass them around to everyone then they would be sharing. Hope this is correct. :)
Answer:
Embargo
Explanation:
I took the test it was an embargo
Hope this helps :D
PLease mark brainliest
Answer:
Firms in monopolistic competition tend to advertise heavily. Monopolistic competition is a form of competition that characterizes a number of industries that are familiar to consumers in their day-to-day lives.
Explanation:
Examples include restaurants, hair salons, clothing, and consumer electronics.
Elected representatives govern in the interest of the people.
