Answer:A plea bargain
Explanation:
A plea bargain refers to a negotiation that is made between a defendant and a prosecutor in which a defendant is advised to plead guilty so that they can get a lesser sentences than when they don't plead guilty. This may go along with some conditions such as doing community service. A plea deal gives some benefits to a defendant that will lessen what would have been a worse penalty for their action. This is however dependent on the condition that a defendant will not break any conditions mentioned under a plea deal.
Plea bargain are accused of being a way of letting guilty guys go free ,when a person who isn't actual guilt plead guilty to a crime they didn't commit.
Answer:
Because the earth spins which causes different time zones. it can be daytime everywhere because the sun cant reach that far
Explanation:
Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
Answer:
The correct answer is ''ability to take the role''.
Explanation:
George Herbert Mead was a social psychologist who explained that the human societies in which we are interested are forest societies. The human individual is a self, only insofar as he takes the attitude of the other towards himself. Insofar as that attitude is that of a certain number of others, insofar as he can adopt the organized attitudes of a certain number of others who are cooperating in a common activity, he takes the group's attitudes towards himself, by taking that or those attitudes, is defining the object of the group that which defines and controls response. For Mead this is possible insofar as people are capable of internalizing the behavior of others, we are capable of acting knowing the behavior that others will do. By internalizing the "generalized other", that is, the attitudes of others, the individual behaves in a certain way.