The Europeans 'wrote' the first question
Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) coordinated a strike of iron ore miners on the Mesabi Iron Range. The strikers fought for higher wages,
Yes, I would definitely support the Compromise of 1850 as it was fundamental to defuse a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848).
All five separate bills were essential, especially when taking into account their influence over the abolitionist movement.
1. It was import to admit California as a free state.
2. Utah and New Mexico territory had to decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.
3. Texas's boundaries were set at their present form, avoiding further conflicts.
4. Slavery trade was abolished in the District of Columbia - which is the first step to abolish slavery itself.
5. The Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened, which furthered the abolitionist cause.
The paraphrase of the information regarding marriage is illustrated below.
<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>
Marriage being a requirement was a result of the circumstances that were bringing civilization to the colony. The collaboration of wives in marriage revealed their means of subsistence. The wives had trading value because the husbands could exchange them for goods like tobacco. Marriage was viewed throughout the colonial era as a requirement for civilisation. It was designed to tame males and offer them a new perspective on the colony that was more mature and civilized. Colonial males were delivered mail-order brides in an arranged marriage. Women today have a greater sense of independence and freedom.
The husband is now viewed as a guardian for the wife rather than the wife's superior. Now, choosing to be married is a decision driven by love. Marriage as a personal decision was impacted by democracy. People's freedom and ability to make their own decisions were impacted by the country's self-governance and the slowing of independence. As families had fewer children in chapter two, I think marriage will change in the future as a result of people having even fewer or no children. Also delaying childbirth due to the increased focus on careers many women today. I think couples will wait longer to even get married or forego marriage altogether while still having children together in the future.
Learn more about marriage on:
brainly.com/question/1265280
#SPJ1
The factors that led to marriage as a necessity were bringing civilization to the colony. Wives' cooperation to marriage reflected their means to survive. The wives carried trade value as the men could sell them for trade such as tobacco. In the colonial years, marriage was seen as a necessary arrangement for civilization. It was intended to tame men and give them a different view, more mature and tamed towards the colony. There was arranged marriage where colonial men were sent mail ordered brides. In current days, women gained a sense of individuality and freedom. The husband is no longer seen as the authoritative figure over the wive but as a protector to her. Marriage has changed to an option that is motivated by love. Democracy had an affect on marriage as a free choice. Self governing of the country and the Deceleration of Independence had an affect on people's independence and personal decision making. As chapter two went over families having less children, I believe marriage will change in the future by people having even fewer or no children. Also, waiting even longer to have children as women are now focusing on careers more. I believe in the future, couples are also waiting longer to even get married or avoiding marriage all together but still having children together and living together as a family.
Write a paraphrase of the information.
Answer:
The correct option is D: taking the cost into account because money spent on pollution reduction is not available for other worthy activities
Explanation:
According to Lawrence Summers analysis, every spend for healthcare needs to be beneficial to the economy at the lowest possible cost. Hence looking at it from his point of view, it would be more moral to reduce pollution, looking at the cost of doing this. This is because there are other aspects that need money and if this money is spent on pollution without considering other areas, then there would not be enough money available for other worthy activities.
