1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
3 years ago
13

What are the rights of a suspect after an arrest or detention?

Law
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures individuals against nonsensical quests and seizures by the public authority. A cop's capture of an individual is a kind of "seizure" that falls under this protected arrangement.  

Yet, what precisely does the term capture mean? When does it happen? Also, what rules do cops need to follow when they make captures? Coming up next is a concise clarification of the privileges of the charged during a capture.  

What Is an Arrest?  

The term capture doesn't have an exact definition, however by and large, a capture happens when an official confines an individual's opportunity. In the event that a sensible individual from the presume's perspective wouldn't don't hesitate to leave an experience with the police, a confinement or capture has happened.  

Detainment. A confinement is brief and casual. For example, a traffic stop is regularly a transitory detainment and not a capture. Another regular illustration of a detainment is the point at which an official sees somebody carrying on dubiously in the city and momentarily stops the individual to pose a couple of inquiries. In the event that the official keeps somebody past the measure of time expected to make a short examination, the detainment may transform into a capture.  

Capture. A capture happens when an official arrests somebody. Guardianship includes a limitation on an individual's development yet doesn't really need binds or an outing to prison (albeit both are by and large great pointers of a capture). A capture can happen a whole lot earlier—when a sensible individual no longer doesn't hesitate to leave.  

When Can Police Make an Arrest?  

To make a legitimate capture, the police need reasonable justification that the speculate perpetrated a wrongdoing. Like the term capture, no precise meaning of reasonable justification exists. By and large, reasonable justification requires more than doubt (or hunch) that a presume perpetrated a wrongdoing however not exactly evidence past a sensible uncertainty. Courts audit the real factors and data encompassing the capture when choosing if the official's faith in the speculate's blame was sensible.  

Suppose Eric possesses a store that sells cell phones. He calls the police to report that his store was burglarized by a lady with light hair driving a dark vehicle. He says she took four telephones, two purple telephone cases, and a couple of earphones. The police see a dark vehicle dashing away from the store. The officials pull the vehicle over for speeding and notice that the driver has light hair. The officials see three telephones, two purple telephone cases, and a couple of earphones on the front seat. The officials have reasonable justification to capture the driver for the theft of Eric's store.  

Do Police Need a Warrant to Arrest Someone?  

The reason for capture warrants is to shield individuals from nonsensical captures under the Fourth Amendment. Courts favor warrants since they like to have an unbiased legal official survey whether the police have reasonable justification before a capture. Yet, courts perceive that acquiring a warrant isn't generally down to earth. Cops can make a capture without a warrant in specific situations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Plaintiff definition
adell [148]

Answer:

a person who brings a case against another in a court of law.

"the plaintiff commenced an action for damages"

6 0
2 years ago
Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
stepan [7]

Answer:

B: keeping foo safe

Explanation:

I guess i don't <em>need</em> an explanation, right?

5 0
3 years ago
What key questions should be asked during an interview with an informant?
Monica [59]

Answer:

Introduction: Before beginning the interview introduce yourself and your

project. As a general rule the introduction you write should do the following: 1)

help establish the purpose for the interview; 2) explain who is involved in the

process (community partnership members); 3) establish credibility for the

interview and yourself as the interviewer; 4) explain why their cooperation is

important in collecting the information you need; and 5) explain what will

happen with the collected information and how the community will benefit.

• Key questions: Draft five to ten questions important to getting the information

you have set out to collect. The key questions should be designed in order to

elicit more revealing information about your community issue or problem. Ask

questions that draw upon the informant's expertise and unique viewpoint.

• Probing questions: Probing questions encourage participants to reflect more

deeply on the meaning of their comments. These questions are also useful at

getting people to think about the cause or root of the problem you are

investigating.

• Closing question: Provide an opportunity for the key informant to give any

additional information or comments. Also ask the key informants for their

recommendations or solutions in addressing the problem.

• Summary: If time permits, quickly summarize the major comments heard

throughout the interview and ask informants if you covered all the major points.

Ask them if there is anything else they would like to tell you that you have not

asked them. Finally, thank them for their time.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
According to demographic trends, a Hispanic female who works in a bank in Los Angeles is most likely to vote for a candidate fro
aliya0001 [1]
A. Democratic Party is the answer
4 0
3 years ago
What were the barons who forced King John II upset about?
Soloha48 [4]

King John demanded soldiers or money from his barons in order to carry on a war in France over disputed lands. Many of the barons believed that the dispute between John and the French king was none of their business. So, they refused to send King John knights or pay what amounted to a special tax.

BRAINLIEST PLEASE

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mr pickles butt hole
    7·1 answer
  • Who may become members of state professional organizations?
    7·2 answers
  • Which reason most closely illustrates why the national government was unable to maintain law and order under the Articles of Con
    10·2 answers
  • Should the larger states with more people living in those states be afforded more
    12·2 answers
  • What do you think is the best way to choose a nation's leader? why?
    10·2 answers
  • .<br> One of alcohol's effects is to
    10·1 answer
  • On what grounds can a lawyer find a juror to be partial
    10·1 answer
  • 10 points
    6·2 answers
  • Vivian (28) is the beneficiary of her deceased grandmother's traditional IRA. She received a Form 1099-R reporting the $10,000 g
    5·1 answer
  • What did Karl Marx say about command economy?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!