Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Answer:
It is about creating meaningful economic and social value.
please brainliest me
Explanation:
It is about creating new benefits that exceed the costs to the business and society. ... They can also increase productivity by addressing social and environmental constraints in the value chain, creating a real impact for suppliers.
The human body as you would expect, it produces free
radicals and the antioxidants to counter their harmful properties. But,
sometimes free radicals outnumbers the naturally occurring antioxidants. For it
to sustain the stability, a constant source of external foundations of
antioxidants is required in order to gain the extreme welfares of antioxidants.
Antioxidants gives benefit to the body by counteracting and eradicating the
free radicals from the bloodstream of our body.
Answer:
Social change involves the alteration of the social order of a society. It may include changes in social institutions, social behaviors, or social relations.
Explanation:
