Jill was a donkey when it came to school
This is the case because according to the Supreme Court, the federal government cannot mandate that states carry out or enforce federal statutes like the Brady Bill.
<h3>What is the
Brady Bill about?</h3>
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, on the 30th day of November, 1993 was enacted, thus effectively modifying or amending it's predecessor - the Gun Control Act of 1968.
This new Act required that everyone who wanted to be armed must wait for five days before a dealer sold a handgun to an individual that is unlicensed.
Learn more about Federal Laws at:
brainly.com/question/554563
#SPJ12
The first casualty of that declaration was not German—but the British ocean liner Athenia, which was sunk by a German U-30 submarine that had assumed the liner was armed and belligerent. There were more than 1,100 passengers on board, 112 of whom lost their lives. Of those, 28 were Americans, but President Roosevelt was unfazed by the tragedy, declaring that no one was to “thoughtlessly or falsely talk of America sending its armies to European fields.” The United States would remain neutral.
<span>a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.</span>
Answer:
When there are conflicting decisions on the same issue by different court of appeals and when there is a rulling based on racial discrimination.
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is simply an order a higher court such as the Supreme Court gives for them to evaluate the decisions and processes in a lower court. This enables the higher court to ascertain if there are wrongdoings in the process. Cases have been brought to the U.S Supreme Court on a regular basis through this method and they have granted only about 1.1% of over a thousand cases.
Writ of certiorari can be issued when a court of appeals in the U.S has made a decision in court which is conflicting with the decision made by another court of appeals in the same country, on the same issue. The losing party in both scenarios here can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Also, where there is an appeal court ruling that does not favor a citizen on a basis of racial discrimination with no precedent, the decision can be appealed. Similar incident happened in the case by Ricky Brown, Raishawn Morris, Charles Battiste against the City of Oneonta, New work in which it was alleged that the enforcement officials carried their tasks while targeting minority members of the area for interrogation based on race.
