Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts receivables = $1,500,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts = $90,000
Expected uncollectibles = $125,000
The collection of accounts receivables after the adjustment for bad debt expense is determined by deducting the expected uncollectibles from the total amount of accounts receivables.
Accounts receivable amount expected to be collected after adjustment for bad debt expense:
= Accounts receivables - Expected uncollectibles
= $1,500,000 - $125,000
= $1,375,000
Considering the scenario described above, at the store, I am an employee. This is because I'm hired full-time.
Also, because an office manager is supervising me, that shows I am an employee.
Also, given that I work within normal business hours at the store, that is a characteristic of an employee. Again, payment of wages is associated with employee relations.
On the other hand, I work as an independent contractor at the pub because I decide the music to play and get paid per gig.
Also, given that I don't work at normal hours and get paid at a lump sum, this is an independent contractor working feature.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that I worked as an independent contractor at the pub and an employee at the store.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20834227
Answer:
the expected return from the investment is higher than that of those investments whose standard deviation is greater than zero.
Explanation:
As for the coefficient of variation which clearly defines the difference in values from the mean value in the data set.
It clearly defines as standard deviation/mean.
Where standard deviation is 0 the coefficient will also be 0 which shall represent the risk associated with it.
The least the coefficient of variation the least the risk with maximum return.
Thus, the correct statement will be concluding that the expected return from this investment will be higher than the returns from the project in which standard deviation is more than 0.
