1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Archy [21]
2 years ago
9

Suppose there is a simultaneous increase in demand and decrease in supply, what effect will this have on the equilibrium price?

Business
1 answer:
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]2 years ago
5 0

Although the impact on the equilibrium quantity cannot be determined, a rise in demand and a decrease in supply will result in an increase in the equilibrium price. 1. Consumers now place a higher value on goods, and producers must charge a higher price to offer the goods; as a result, prices will rise for all quantities.

If demand increases at the same time as supply increases, as is the case in the scenario depicted, the new equilibrium price will be greater than the initial equilibrium price.

We therefore know that an increase in supply decreases equilibrium price and increases quantity, while a rise in supply increases equilibrium price and decreases quantity (and vice versa) (and vice versa).

To learn more on equilibrium price

brainly.com/question/14480835

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
The Animè Sushi Bar collects data on how many dragon rolls and sashimi are made per hour. Dragon rolls take longer to make than
kobusy [5.1K]

The difference in production is most likely due to adding a chef, because production increased across the board at each level for both types of rolls. If there was only one chef, one roll would increase and the other would decrease because they could only spend their time on one thing.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Đặc điểm cơ bản của tài chính gián tiếp là gì
nevsk [136]

Answer:

I can't understand anything

8 0
3 years ago
Which of these is not a result of regular exercise?
Paul [167]
B) causing your heart to wear out faster
4 0
3 years ago
You purchased 1,000 shares of the New Fund at a price of $20 per share at the beginning of the year. You paid a front-end load o
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

6.37%

Explanation:

Rate of return

= (Aggregate investment value after one year - Investment value) / investment value   ----- equation 1

Cost of shares =number of shares* price per share

             = 1000* $20 =$20,000

Total amount invested = Purchasing cost /(1- front-end load)

               = $20,000 / (1-0.04)

                =$20,000 / 0.96 = $20,833.333

Investment value after one year

           = Total Investment*( 1+ price increase-expense ratio)

         = $20,000( 1 +0.12 -0.012)

          = $20,000(1.12-0.012) = $20,000 * 1.108 = $22,160

From equation 1 above

Rate of return = ($22,160 - $ 20,833.333) / $20,833.333

        $ 1,326.667 / $ 20,833.333

= 0.06368001701

  = 0.0637

Since rates of return are expressed as %, we multiply the result by 100 to get

  0.0637*100 =6.37%

My rate of return on the fund will be 6.37% if I sell the shares at the end of the year.

7 0
3 years ago
A struggling company currently has a total value of $700,000. It owes $500,000 from debt financing (assume these are loans from
Lynna [10]

Answer:

What is the current value of the firm to the owners?

total value - debt = $700,000 - $500,000 = $200,000

Show that this in expectation decreases the firm’s value, and explain why, in spite of that, the owners of the company would want to undertake the project.

the expected value of the company after the new project = (50% x 0) + (50% x $1,200,000) = $600,000, so the net value of the company actually decreases by $100,000.

the issue here is that if things go wrong, the owners will lose $200,000, but if things go well, then the owners equity will increase by $500,000 to a total of $700,000. In this case, the expected value of this project for the owners = (50% x -$200,000) + (50% x $700,000) = $250,000.

I am assuming that this company is some type of corporation, LLC or LLP, not a partnership or sole proprietorship. Under current bankruptcy laws, when a cooperation goes bankrupt, the owners are not personally liable for it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For what purpose are goods and services produced in a socialist economy
    5·1 answer
  • As you play a Star Trek video game, you track all of the Romulan warships as they fly across the screen, attacking your ship, th
    14·1 answer
  • Prices are high at hotels when it is low season in a tourist destination.<br><br> True<br> False
    12·2 answers
  • Consider a Treasury bill with a rate of return of 5% and the following risky securities: Security
    15·1 answer
  • Regarding convergence of accounting standards, the FASB and IASB:
    8·1 answer
  • 16. Which is NOT true about stocks? (1 point)
    9·1 answer
  • Autumnâ Services, Inc. acquired 124 comma 000 shares of Springâ Metals, Inc. on Januaryâ 1, 2018. Spring declares a cash dividen
    12·1 answer
  • Summerlin Company budgeted 4,000 pounds of material costing $5.00 per pound to produce 2,000 units. The company actually used 4,
    7·1 answer
  • What macroeconomic goal is Real GDP used to measure for?
    12·1 answer
  • The correct decision of decision variable are
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!