Answer:
Based on the information supply of cards is more elastic (price sensitive) than that of roses
Explanation:
Price elasticity of supply is defined as the sensitivity of quantity supplied to changes in price.
The formula is given below
Price elasticity of supply= Change in quantity supplied ÷ Change in price
In this scenario the demand for both roses and cards increases, however the price of roses increases more.
This implies that the denominator in the formula is higher in roses resulting in smaller price elasticity of supply.
The elasticity of supply for cards is higher than that of roses, so it is more sensitive to changes in price.
Cards can be stored from year to year so the labour for maintaining a stock of cards is low with resultant low price.
On the other hand roses require care to grow. It requires watering, application of chemicals to treat infestation and so on. So suppliers tend to push the extra cost of growing roses to the buyers
<span>The answer is : No coverage for xyx. Bob, an accountant of xyz, drives his own car to the bank to make a deposit for xyz. bob has an at-fault accident. if xyz carries $1,000,000 bodily injury/property damage coverage with a symbol 2 for covered autos, and bob carries no insurance, No coverage is applicable for xyz. </span>
Answer:
c. volume of goods or services moved to or from location i
Explanation:
we know as per Rectilinear Distance formula
Wi = Ci × Qi .........................1
here Wi is the transportation cost of carry load for the customer “i”
we can say it is weighted load values so volume of goods or services moved to or from location
so correct option is c. volume of goods or services moved to or from location i
Answer:
Its A
Explanation:
Because people dont like wierd ads and sketchy things
Answer: The service cost component of a defined benefit pension plan is computed as the: <em><u>Present value of the change in pension liability from additional employee service. </u></em>
The service cost of a defined benefit pension plan is the change in the pension liability caused by one additional year of employee service. Also an expected return on pension plan assets does not cause an increase in the pension expense for a defined benefit plan.
