Answer:
$3500 is deductible
Explanation:
The question is not complete . Please see the solution below :
The Investment Interest expense can be set off against Net Investment income ( Interest income - Investment expenses i.e $25000-$2000=$23000) to the extent and the remaining is carried forward to the next year. so here the investment interest expense is wholly set off against the interest income i.e $3500 is deductible
Answer:
Late Majority.
Explanation:
The adoption of a product by consumers is divided into five categories, namely, <u>innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards</u>. Such customers are known as adopters who adopt to new technology differently. The category of adopters was proposed by Everett Rogers in 1962.
In the given scenario, Emy exemplifies Late majority adopter.
Late Majority adopters are those adopters who adopts new innovation or technology after observing that the product has been adopted fruitfully by the majority of society. They rank on the second last position of the adopters. They are more skeptical to the product before adopting it. So, Emy fits the late majority category of adopters as she is skeptical about the fancy device shown by her friend.
Answer:
Option "A" is the correct answer to the following statement.
Explanation:
Cross-sectional observational estimates are based on findings with Various data that exist in various groups in the same period. This indicates that there was no other procedure wad made, so no factors are influenced by the analyst.
In this situation, there were various age groups involved in the Experiment at the same time.
Answer:
b. The stock price will not change, because the market had already incorporated the information about the FDA approval announcement in the stock price.
Explanation:
If the markets are strong form efficient, it means the consensus of the market related to future impact of FDA approval on earnings would be correct, the stock price of today correctly estimates the future earnings, and therefore the stock price would not change when the earnings are released.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The economists would disagree with this policy because the opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit. The industries involved may have to stop their industrial activities out-rightly or temporarily until they come up with other ways of production which may bring unemployment, reduction in tax paid to government among others.
