Answer:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
Explanation:
For this case the graph attached illustrate the problem for this case
We know that the total area is 60000, so then we have:
If we solve for x we got:
(1)
Now we can define the cost function like this:
We can use the condition (1) and if we replace in the cost function we have:
Since we need to minimize the cost, we can derivate the function in terms of y and we got:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
Answer:
The answer is A. non-operating expense
Explanation:
As he operates a retail shop, such advertising is vital to attract customers to the shops and to make potential sales. We can't treat this expenses as administration or production expenses.
We consider this as non operational because advertising is not an operational part of the operations of a retail business. Moreover, we can't consider it as selling expenses because they are mostly incurred during the sales process.
To complete the statement above:<span>
Dynamic pricing is particularly suitable for Internet-based companies like Amazon who want to be responsive to shoppers' desires and marketplace changes.
Dynamic pricing is a way to deal with setting the cost for an item or administration that is exceedingly adaptable. The objective of dynamic valuing is to permit an organization that pitches merchandise or administrations over the Internet to modify costs on the fly because of market requests.
</span>
Answer:
119.4% for 2017 and 100.0% for 2016.
Explanation:
2017 2016
Net sales $276,200 $231,400
Cost of goods sold $151,900 $129,590
Operating expenses $55,240 $53,240
Net earnings $27,820 $19,820
since we are using 2016 as a base year, the $231,400 in net sales represent 100%, so the trend percentage for 2017 = net sales 2017 / net sales 2016 $276,200 / $231,400 = 1.1936 = 119.4% or a 19.4% increase.
The base year's amount will always be 100% or 1, and the trend percentages will change relative to that year.
Answer:
The correct answer is number (1): double indemnity provision.
Explanation:
A double indemnity provision is added in life insurance to double the amount the beneficiaries of the policyholder receive in front of his or her death in an accident. Double indemnity provision does not cover events in which the policyholder dies because of natural reasons or when those individuals had hazardous jobs. Premiums are higher with a double indemnity provision.
