The personal property items that have the HIGHEST specific limitation on coverage are jewelry, watches, and precious stones or metals because they are saved in a location, especially in banks
<h3 /><h3>The properties having HIGHEST specific limitation on coverage.</h3>
A limit is the highest amount your insurer will pay for a claim that your insurance policy covers.
Some of these specific limits apply to a building or personal property at a single location.
From the listed option, the personal property items that have the HIGHEST specific limitation on coverage are jewelry, watches, and precious stones or metals because they are saved in a location, especially in banks
Learn more on specific limitations on coverage here: brainly.com/question/27015627
The answer is fales hope i helped
Answer:
$428,000
Explanation:
The only movement that impact the total assets it's:
Kirk Corporation acquired equipment costing $3,000, promising to pay cash for it in 60 days.
Due to the equipment was finance by the supplier by 60 days it has a positive impact on assets and liabilities.
The others transactions:
- Kirk Corporation purchased $1,750 of supplies for cash, it has no impact because the supplies was paid with cash, so the impact on assets is zero.
- The land had cost $7,500 and it was sold for $7,500 cash. The land it's a long term assets that was sold for cash, so it was converted to current assets in money.
- Kirk Corporation signed an agreement, the impact it's in the next month, so it has no impact the current month analized.
Answer:
lets look at the options and find the correct one!
obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.
Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.
Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!
d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.
e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.
but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. enforce the policy or recover the amount of the premiums paid.
Explanation:
Petra being a a member of the class of persons protected by the statute is a big advantage. This translates to lesser or no punishments at all for defaulting the set rules and protocols of insurance in his/her state.
This means Petra can either enforce the law as a top person or recover the amount of premiums paid.
