1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firdavs [7]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following courts would not include a jury? Select all that apply.

Law
1 answer:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Trial Jury

A trial jury, also known as a petit jury, decides whether the defendant committed the crime as charged in a criminal case, or whether the defendant injured the plaintiff in a civil case.

Consists of 6-12 people.

Trials are generally public, but jury deliberations are private.

Defendants have the right to appear, testify, and call witnesses on their behalf.

Final outcome is a verdict, in favor of plaintiff or defendant in a civil case, or guilty/not guilty in a criminal case.

Grand Jury

A grand jury is presented with evidence from the U.S. attorney, the prosecutor in federal criminal cases. The grand jury determines whether there is “probable cause” to believe the individual has committed a crime and should be put on trial. If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, an indictment will be issued against the defendant.

Consists of 16-23 people.

Grand jury proceedings are not open to the public.

Defendants and their attorneys do not have the right to appear before the grand jury.

Explanation: bench trial is a trial by judge, as opposed to a trial by jury. The term applies most appropriately to any administrative hearing in relation to a summary offense to distinguish the type of trial. Many legal systems (Roman, Islamic) use bench trials for most or all cases or for certain types of cases.

You might be interested in
What should be the punishment of those who eat pizza with pineaplle
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Let them have cheese on their pineapples along with plenty of salt

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Explain the interaction view of lawmaking and provide an example.
nordsb [41]

Answer:

1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .

6 0
3 years ago
PLZ ANSWER BOTH QUESTIONS!!!
Arlecino [84]

Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.

Explanation:

The advantage of insanity defense is that the accused could avoid penalized with death, even if he is guilty. In the context of crime the sentence is very convenient as compared with an accused who is proven to be guilty, but it is not proven.

The insanity defense is rarely used because of the difficulty in providing legal insanity. Many criminal defendants suffer from mental illness and produce evidence of this illness such as psychiatric testimony.

Hence,  Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result because it changes person completely and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.

7 0
3 years ago
Explain the sources of each type of law and provide examples of each:
Anna [14]

Answer:

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

Explanation:

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

3 0
2 years ago
discuss the rule of law as a democratic principle which causes democracy, under the heading b) its benefits​
stiks02 [169]

Explanation:

<h3>The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle stated succinctly that "laws should govern". In simple terms, democracy focuses on how societies select those who will hold power, while the rule of law is concerned with how political power is exercised. </h3><h3>The aim of rule of law like other constitutional principles is the uplifting of freedom and fundamental rights of the people. The rule of law has propounded to make sure that the executive doesn't use law of the land or country to oppress or curtail freedom of individuals as they are found in the bill of rights.</h3>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A democratic government differs from a dictatorship in the way that it:
    9·1 answer
  • Appellate court judges ask these during oral<br> argument
    14·1 answer
  • Grounds on which the registrar of a partnership business may lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    15·1 answer
  • Nicki Minaj (50% full power) vs Scarlet Witch who wins
    9·1 answer
  • The Great Compromise called for representation in the House of Representatives to be based on
    5·1 answer
  • 4. High-risk drivers habitually deviate from driving norms.<br> T or F<br> Need help please
    10·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST!!
    10·1 answer
  • 19. Which of these vehicles must stop before crossing railroad tracks?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help, i will give brainliest to the right answer
    15·1 answer
  • True or false: According to routine activities theory, if a suitable target, no capable guardian, and motivated offenders are pr
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!