Update: The answer was correct I took the test
Answer:
I believe the answer is
Rational negative 4 over 5., 2.5, 0 point 4 bar., square root of 16.
Irrational square root of 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because -4/5, 2.5, square root of 16 are all rational.
and square root of 2 is irrational, I will say there is a promblem with the answer because of 0 point 4 bar is irrational i believe but it's in the rational spot.
Again I am not sure this answer is totally correct but i will updated the answer when I am done with the test.
Answer:
The distance between the two playing pieces is of 6.4 units.
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose we have two points:


The distance between these points is:

Distance between:
A(-2,3) and B(3,-1)

The distance between the two playing pieces is of 6.4 units.
Answer:
angle 2
Step-by-step explanation:
alternate interior angles are angles formed when two parallel or non parallel line are intersected by a transversal ....
Answer:
Probability: 0.7190
There is not enough evidence at the 5% level of significance to suggest that there is difference in proportions of red-light runners between the two intersections
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in proportion of red-light runners between the 2 lights, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether there is a difference, meaning that the difference can be higher or lower. If there is a difference, the proportions are not equal. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 ≠ 0
This is a two tailed test
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.96 or z < -1.96.
If our test statistic falls in either region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
See the attached photo for the hypothesis and conclusion
The z-value of the test statistic is z = 0.58.
P(z < 0.58) = 0.7190
Let

denote the event that an HD is defective, and

the event that a particular HD was produced at facility

.
You are asked to compute



From the definition of conditional probabilities, the first two will require that you first find

. Once you have this, part (c) is trivial.
I'll demonstrate the computation for part (a). Part (b) is nearly identical.
(a)

Presumably, the facility responsible for producing a given HD is independent of whether the HD is defective or not, so

.
Use the law of total probability to determine the value of the denominator:

We know each of the component probabilities because they are given explicitly: 0.015, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively. So

and thus

(b) Similarly,

(c)