Scots-irish migrants increasingly opposed quaker policy in the 1740s because they?

1 answer:

4 0

Scots-Irish migrants increasingly opposed quaker policy in the 1740s because they: c. opposed the colony's pacifism toward Native Americans.

Many Americans of Celtic descent additionally mistakenly agree with their Irish whilst in truth, they may be Scots-Irish. Scots-Irish Americans are descendants of Scots who lived in Northern Ireland for two or 3 generations however retained their Scottish individual and Protestant faith.

Scotch-Irish or Scots-Irish may additionally talk over with: Ulster-Scots people, an ethnic institution in Ulster, eire, who trace their roots to settlers from Scotland. Scotch-Irish people, descendants of Ulster Scots who first migrated to the USA in huge numbers in the 18th and nineteenth centuries.

The Scots had been Presbyterians and the English Anglicans with a few dissenting creeds. consequently, we've got the Scotch-Irish who later have been to be one of these big elements in settling the new international.

Learn more about Scots-Irish here:

brainly.com/question/24669938

#SPJ4

Disclaimer: your question is incomplete please see below for the complete question

a. wanted laws that respected their inheritance customs.

b. wanted greater representation in the colonial assembly.

c. opposed the colony's pacifism toward Native Americans.

d. opposed Quaker's attempts to enforce moral behavior.

You might be interested in

Give me a question about system of government.<br> any question i just need one

adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

how does the californian judicary system work without democratic bias?

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

what physical features does Greece have that would have encouraged the Greeks to make their living from the sea?

Zanzabum

Greece is very hilly so it was hard for the ancients greeks to farm the land and use crops as a main source of food so instead they use sea food as a main source of food since they are sorounded by the ocean.

7 0

2 years ago

Sam Houston made treaties with the Native Americans, what did the treaties entail?

cricket20 [7]

In an effort to prevent any alliances between the Cherokee Indians and the Mexicans, the Federal Government sent Sam Houston and John Forbes to the territories occupied by the Native Americans in order to negotiate the boundaries in which they could peacefully settle. These negotiations ended with a treaty on February 23, 1836. However, this document was rejected by the Senate because it considered the consultation had exceeded its powers by offering land grants to the Cherokees. Houston decided to disregard this and maintained the kept the treaty made with the Indians. However, President Mirabeau B. Lamar would ultimately agree with the Senate's interpretations and leave the treaty without effect.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was a power given by the Articles of Confederation? Question 16 options: A) Printing money B) Collecting taxes C) Controlli

uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

protecting individual rights

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write a cer about why there was conflict over immigrants

aliina [53]

Answer:

Migration is variously characterized as an important determinant of violent conflict and political instability, national power, imperial expansion, ethnic conflict, radicalism, terrorism, environmental degradation, and economic growth or stagnation. In high immigration receiving states such as Australia and the United States—among the world's most inclusive migrant incorporation regimes—immigration increasingly complicates foreign policy making choices, and may present challenges to each host nation's internal cohesion.. Issues such as dual nationality, social exclusion, multiculturalism, and fear of international terrorism—especially in a post-9/11 context—generate considerable political heat and public debate.

2nd paragraph: Combatants in the immigration debate start from very different world views – not only emphasizing different values but almost speaking different languages. To avoid destructive backlashes, reformers must understand and respect the values and perspectives of all groups involved in public debates.Immigration—and public policies to manage it—arouses strong emotions and fierce social and political battles, not just in the United States but in most other countries across the world. Why is this true? Each nation has its own issues that inspire or enrage, of course, but there are widespread, underlying patterns that can be identified and taken into consideration by reformers.

3 0

2 years ago