Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Carlos’ goal is to reduce average loan processing by fifteen percent within the next 6 months. - Reviewed goal.
Reviewed goals has to do with the goals set by an individual when the individual takes into consideration the previously set goals and he or she reviews them. This is used by Carlos as he takes into consideration his previous average loan processing.
b. Michelle is a salesperson. Her goal is to increase the number of sales calls made to potential customers. - Relevant goal.
Relevant goal simply means that the goal must be realistic and also reasonable. In this scenario, Michelle wants to increase the number of calls regarding sales made to customers. This is reasonable.
c. Sam has been reviewing customer accounts at a rate of two per day. His goal is to double that rate. That is possible, but he’ll have to work hard and be creative to reach this goal. - Achievable goals.
Achievable goal simply means a goal that it's possible for an individual to achieve and it's attainable.
d. Chen has been given a project, and his manager clearly communicated the quantity and quality expectations to him. - Specific goals
A specific goal is a goal that is well defined and also clear. This can be seen in the above example.
e. Elizabeth has just been given a project which needs to be completed within 6 weeks. - Time frame goal.
Time frame goal is a goal that has a deadline and is expected to be finished within a set date. In this scenario, Elizabeth has six weeks to complete the said project.
f. Kelly is most excited about adopting goals because it means she’ll finally have a clear measure of how well she is doing. - Measurable goal.
A measurable goal is a goal that one tracks his or her progress as one continues the project. Kelly has a clear measure of how well she's doing. This is a measurable goal.
Answer:
D) It considers market growth rate to be a measure of market attractiveness
Explanation:
In 1970, Bruce D. Henderson developed and created a growth-share matrix for the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) growth-share matrix is a tool used for analyzing and planning product lines in a business unit. It makes use of a graphical representation of a company's product line and services to analyze and make long-term strategic plans on which to invest more on or sell off.
Generally, products are divided into four (4) main categories in the BCG growth-share matrix;
1. Dogs.
2. Stars.
3. Question marks.
4. Cash cows.
The statement which is true of the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix approach is that, it considers market growth rate to be a measure of market attractiveness.
Marketing can be defined as the process of developing promotional techniques and sales strategies by a firm, so as to enhance the availability of goods and services to meet the needs of the end users or consumers through advertising and market research.
Thus, it comprises of all the activities such as, identifying, anticipating set of medium and processes for creating, promoting, delivering, and exchanging goods and services that has value for customers. It typically, involves understanding customer needs, building and maintaining healthy relationships with them in order to scale up your business.
The problems with price gouging laws that keep prices low are:
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
Here are the options to this questions:
- Price gouging laws reduce shortages after a disaster by keeping prices low.
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- When prices rise after a disaster, consumers are encouraged to consume less of the good and leave some for others to purchase; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces producers to produce more of the needed goods
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces consumers to buy less of the good than they otherwise would
Price gouging is when the price of a good or a service is increased to very high levels when the demand for the product is higher than the supply of the product. Price gouging usually occurs after an event. For example, after a natural disaster.
In order to prevent price gouging, the government can set a price ceiling. A price ceiling is when the maximum price for a good or service is set by the government. When prices are prevented from rising above a particular price, this benefits consumers as they would be able to purchase goods at a cheaper price. But producers would be disadvantaged because their profit margins would fall. This can lead to a shortage problem as demand would exceed supply.
To learn more about price gouging, please check: brainly.com/question/10477659?referrer=searchResults
3. For a perfectly competitive market to function properly, buyers and sellers must have access to adequate information. Adequate information is such information that the purchaser considers important for him. So the purchaser, company or investors should have an opportunity to get the information how it is.
4. Natural monopoly can be explained like the situation where one company can supply market's entire with some unique raw materials or technology. So there can't be more than one company which provides this material or technology. According to this, I think the answer is diamonds.
5. As far as I remember, oligopoly is a market that has a few firms dominating the market. That means there is a small competition as there are small number of buyers and sellers.
6. If my memory serves me well, economies of scale happen <span>when a firms' long run average costs decrease with output. So if there is no economies of scale, I'm pretty sure that costs go up.
7. I think that correct definition looks like this: Combination of two or more companies in a single firm is called a merger. Resources of both companies are pooled together, and the owners of each company remain owners. There are to types of merger entities:
-Horizontal integration - if the merged companies are competitors.
- Vertical integration - if the companies are supplier and customer.
8. I am definitely sure that the answer is: </span>Offering products of different tastes and shapes is an example of non-price competition. That means that the competing companies wouldn't challenge by lowering the prices. Every competitor will focus on highlighting benefits of their product, to show that their product is better than another one.
9. The controller of a monopoly sets the price of goods by charging the price at which the profit is maximized. Monopoly is a firm which has no competition, so they doesn't have to worry about losing their customers. Company can set monopoly price which is pretty much higher than products marginal cost. That allows company to have maximum profit.
10. Many critics argue that government efforts to regulate industries have caused inefficiencies. Inefficiency means that the company can't achieve enough productivity. This caused because of high taxes, bureaucracy and other factors.
11. This agreement is called price-fixing. Companies which have come to this conspiracy can't sell goods below fixed price. There are many way to fix price by setting the price high or low. That leaves customer no choice and makes him to buy product at the fixed price.
12. D<span>eregulating industries is not a method that the government uses to intervene and prevent firms from controlling the price and supply of important goods. Deregulation of industry means that government power in a particular industry is reduced. Deregulation removes barriers to competition.
13. I think, I'd go with this: </span><span>Price Fixing, Collusion, And Cartels. Oligopolies can arrange those three together and that lets them to charge prices like monopoly. Government stays sharp with oligopolies using this method.
14. I think it's obviously a start-up costs. Every business need money to set it up. But all of them are different and require different types of costs. So it would be appropriate to create a business plan that helps to consider different start-up costs for your business.
15. I'm 100% sure, that the answer is: C</span><span>ompared to a market with perfect competition, a monopoly often has higher prices and fewer goods. Monopoly usually provides unique raw materials and technologies. As I've mentioned before, monopoly has no competition and it lets company to charge high prices for their goods.
16. I think that the </span><span>lack of technological know-how can't prevent the company being competitive as there's not the most important factor in a particular business.
17. As far as I remember, efficiency is one of the main characteristics of competitive market, which could be achieved with minimum government intervention.
18. According to what I've mentioned above about oligopoly, correct answer should be: E</span>conomists usually call an industry an oligopoly if the four largest firms produce at least 70–80 percent of the output.
19. As I've mentioned it in question 6. total cost curve with economies of scale will decrease on the increasing output. But it refers to firms long run average total cost.
20. I'm definitely sure that the answer is: <span>It has reduced start-up costs for many businesses. Because with the Internet, there's no necessary to set up brick and mortar business. You can just build your business online by making a website. This is a huge economy.</span>
Answer:
1. attention to detail
2. Juris Doctor degree
3. critical-thinking skills
4. research skills
Hope you have a good day ^w^
