Answer:
Power Distance
Explanation:
Power Distance -
It refers to the distribution of the power and strengths within any organisation if referred to as power distance .
In most of the scenario the distribution of power is very unequal and unfair .
Most of the high power people tends to dominate over others and misuse their strengths in a very unfair manner .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The manager of the company has all the power and tends to dominate over others and others people tends not to go against his order .
Hence , the correct term is power distance .
Answer:
Duress/Coercion/Compulsion
Explanation:
Duress or Coercion or Compulsion: This type of defense involves someone else threatening to use force or violence to get you to do something against your better judgment. Essentially, it means you were forced to commit a crime. In this case, Reuben want to entangle the elderly lady into the crime of bank heist by threatening to shoot her husband.
For a defense of Duress/Coercion/Compulsion: the person must be forced to commit the offence. The person under duress (illegal coercion usually through being threatened or the use of violence) must be present when the offence is committed. The person must believe that the threat will be carried out.
Answer:
Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?
Marston C Company should reject the project because its expected return is lower than Division H's cost of capital.
Since the divisions' risk is so different, and probably their projects are also very different, the company should use different costs of capital to accept of reject the projects based on each division's cost of capital.
Imagine another situation where Division L is evaluating a project that yields 10%. If they used the company's WACC, then they should reject the project, but if they used the division's cost of capital, then they should accept the project (in this case I would recommend accepting it).
Explanation:
Division H's risk = 14%
Division L's risk = 8%
WACC = 11%
Answer:
Controllable margin= $300,000
Controllable margin in %= 33.3%
Explanation:
Controllable margin is sales revenue less controllable variable costs and fixed cost.
Controllable margin= Sales revenue - controllable variable cost - controllable fixed costs
Controllable margin= contribution margin - fixed costs
= 500,000 - 200,000= 300,000
Controllable margin in %= 300,000/900,000 × 100 =33.3%
Controllable margin in %= 33.3
Answer:
c. progressive tax
Explanation:
Progressive tax can be regarded as one of the tax structure whereby the tax payer that receive higher incomes in the state pay a higher share of taxes from the income they made, which is different from those that receive Lower income. It is a tax system whereby when there is increase in tax rate then the taxable amount increases too. It should be noted that the tax structured where people with the same income pay the same percentage of their income in taxes is reffered to as progressive tax. wealth/property tax is one of the example of progressive tax.
