Not only were the initial colonists in the Chesapeake region lazy and unambitious but their aspirations were also hindered before they even got started. A single plant provided an answer to these issues. However, the colonists eventually ran into a lot of issues as a result of this cash crop.
<h3>Who are Colonists?</h3>
The practice of colonialism involves one country assuming complete or partial political control over another and settling there with settlers in order to take advantage of that country's resources and economy. It might be challenging to tell colonialism from imperialism because both involve the political and economic dominance of a dominating country over a weak territory. From the dawn of time until the beginning of the 20th century, strong nations fought openly for control of new territories through colonialism. By the time World War I broke out in 1914, nearly every continent had been colonized by European nations. Although colonialism is not as actively implemented as it once was, there is evidence that it still has influence in the modern world.
Thus, yes the colonists in the Chesapeake region were lazy and ignorant.
For more information on Chesapeake, refer to the given link:
brainly.com/question/5231025
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. Located in a singles' building
Explanation:
The Fair Housing Act is a law that prevents homeowners from making it difficult or impossible to rent or buy a home because of racist, xenophobic and homophobic concepts among other forms of discrimination. One of the forms of discrimination that this law prohibits is about family status that informs what family situation an individual is in. In this case, the option "Located in a singles' building" provides a type of violation of this law, since this option generalizes a type of family status, which can cause discrimination.
<h2><em><u>Question:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>W</em><em>hy is it essential to have basic information about the foreign employment</em><em>?</em>
<h2><em><u>Answer:</u></em></h2>
- <em>Because,</em><em> </em><em>Foreign employment reduces the unemployment problem of a country. It may help to develop international relations with other countries.</em>
<h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>because the country has to do labour contract with other countries and embassies has to be established there.</em>
<em>#</em><em>B</em><em>r</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em>B</em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>c</em><em>h</em>
Answer:
This is an example of a patriarchal society. Women had no freedom at the time and still are not treated equally. They could not hold a job besides being a housewife andd taking care of the kids. They could not leave the house. Women are still not treated the same and are payed less. They are considered a minority. Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
