The answer is: <span>because proximity promotes familiarity
Humans are most likely to let our guard down if we're near the people that we're familiar with.
Due to the close relation that created by proximity, we're most likely to meet that individual much more often compared to other individual, which make us much more familiar with that individual's behavior and personalities.</span>
I believe the answer is: theory
Theory refers to the initial ideas that is used as an explanation for a certain principle.
Even though technically theory is just a form of guess that initiated before making the experiments, the guess is based on the general principles that accepted by most people in that field and could be changed depending on the available evidence.
Answer:
Explanation:
That may depend on which Country you are talking about......
Answer:
Quota sampling
Explanation:
Quota Sampling is a non-probability sampling method in which the population is divided in <u>mutually exclusive subgroups</u> and the items from each of the subgroups are <u>selected based on a proportion. </u>
<u></u>
In this example the households were divided into <u>two subgroups: single-person households and husband-wife households </u>(it is clear that this subgroups are mutually exclusive). Then, since 40% of all households are single-person and 60% are husband-wife, t<u>he researcher ask interviewers to collect information based on this proportion,</u> therefore, 40% of the interviews will be done with single-person households and 60% with husband-wife households. Thus, these interviews are done based on a proportion.
We can see that the example meets all the requirements for quota sampling and thus, it's an example of this type of sampling.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Decisions under risk".
Explanation:
- When those risks are known or could be inferred, the option of an appropriate strategy based on such probabilities is called under-risk decision-making.
- Risk means a degree or a level of uncertainty as well as an inability to effectively predict the effects or effects of an event.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
