1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
1 year ago
10

your next-door neighbors want to go on a european vacation but cannot afford it. so they decide to visit a local amusement park

instead. this is an example of: multiple choice question.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Dmitry [639]1 year ago
6 0

Your next-door neighbors want to go on a European vacation but cannot afford it. so they decide to visit a local amusement park instead. this is an example of the economizing problem.

<h3>What's a profitable problem?</h3>
  • Profitable systems as a type of social system must defy and break the three abecedarian profitable problems.
  • What kinds and amounts of goods shall be produced," how important and which of indispensable goods and services shall be produced?"
  • How shall goods be produced?. by whom and with what coffers( using what technology).?"
  • For whom are the goods or services produced? Who benefits? Samuelson reworded this question as" how is the aggregate of the public product to be distributed among different individualities and families?
<h3>Why is the scrimping problem important?</h3>
  • All societies face the profitable problem, which is the problem of how to make the stylish use of limited, or scarce, coffers.
  • The profitable problem exists because, although the requirements and wants of people are endless, the coffers available to satisfy requirements and wants are limited.

Learn more about economizing problem here:

brainly.com/question/15505681

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
A cattle-producing state adopted a statute requiring any food service business operating in the state to serve beef raised in th
Alex17521 [72]

Answer: A. The statute burdens foreign commerce

Explanation:

The options are:

A. The statute burdens foreign commerce.

B. The statute violates equal protection guarantees because it is not rational to prohibit the sale of foreign beef but not foreign leather.

C. The statute substantially interferes with the vendor's right to earn a living under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

D. The statute constitutes a taking without due process of law.

From the question, we are informed that a cattle-producing state adopted a statute that requires any food service business operating in the state to serve beef raised in the United States and that a licensed hot dog vendor who worked at a football field within the state and who had been buying hot dogs made with foreign beef for the past several years calculated that switching to an all-beef hot dog made from United States beef would reduce his profits by 10%.

The vendor then hired an attorney to challenge the statute and the attorney discovered during research into the case that most of the footballs used at the football field at which the vendor worked were made of foreign leather.

Based on the above scenario, it should be noted that it is the Congress that has power to regulate foreign commerce. Hence, in this scenario, the state adopting a legislation that requires the private vendors to favor the breed served in the United States over the foreign products is outside its powers scope. Only the congress can make such decision.

3 0
3 years ago
Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between
Viktor [21]

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.  

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.  

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.  

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.  

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

3 0
3 years ago
In complete sentences, describe what causes the phases of the moon.
Alenkinab [10]
Moon phases are caused by the motions of the Earth and moon as they relate to the sun.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can a country make progress without education?Give your opinion​
spin [16.1K]
No
You need to be educated to make smart choices which leads to progression
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
VARVARA [1.3K]
The answer for this is C ;)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the oceans on the map
    6·2 answers
  • major argument of opponents of the 1919 treaty of versailles was that the treaty would require the us to
    5·1 answer
  • Neo-colonialism is defined as:
    6·1 answer
  • Given the high level of uncertainty present at the onset of the entry phase, as the amount of verbal communication between stran
    13·2 answers
  • How did the American colonies act when they found out about the Quebec act?
    5·1 answer
  • How are you, as an individual, affected by global economy
    8·1 answer
  • Which number BEST represents the Yellow Sea? A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4
    6·2 answers
  • What is the capital of Arkansas?
    5·2 answers
  • How do you respect the rights of others?​
    6·2 answers
  • What adaptation do most fish have to sink and dive? Question 9 options: a swim bladder a swim kidney a swim lung a swim kidney
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!