More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.

1 answer:

5 0

It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.

<h3>What is the meaning of felonious attacks?</h3>

As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.

These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.

Missing options True/False

<h3 />

You might be interested in

FELLOW MEP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

i followed you

Explanation:

Good job!

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Witch statement correctly describe law

dedylja [7]

Explanation:

Laws explain observations. Laws are factual statements.Give brainliist!!!!!!!!!!! Which statement is correct about Kepler's laws of planetary motion

7 0

3 years ago

Sanitation rules are established by:

ioda

Answer:

The answer is probably C because I looked it up on the internet.

8 0

2 years ago

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1

3 years ago