1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
2 years ago
10

Why won’t anyone answer my questions

Law
2 answers:
Makovka662 [10]2 years ago
8 0
Im also here if I see them
taurus [48]2 years ago
3 0
I’m here to answer lol
You might be interested in
What is the name given to groups who oppose specific placement of land usages using nuisance theories and local zoning laws? a.
algol [13]

Answer: b. NIMBYs

Explanation:

NIMBY is actually an acronym for the word "not in my back yard"). Nimby occurs when residents oppose specific placement of land usages using nuisance theories and local zoning laws.

In some cases however, the oppositions posed by these NIMBYs can be trashed and silenced through a constitutional process and making the NIMBYs know the usefulness of the proposed development in such areas.

The name given to this group is called Nimbys.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0
2 years ago
How do you understand the due process as a right.​
Serhud [2]
Why do work have to be so hard bro
3 0
2 years ago
How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
What are the three arguments concerning the Integration angle in Affirmative Action? (Name all three and explain)
snow_tiger [21]

Answer Integration angle just means peoples perspective on integration!

Explanation:

I had a little trouble reading this so I apologize if it's not correct!

Try rewording the question as: What are 3 arguments people make against integration when it comes to affirmative action?

I sadly do not know the 3 arguments regarding integration in affirmative action, but I hope the way I reworded the question helps! The term "integration angle" is rather confusing.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do the protestors with the signs saying "A livable planet is an unalienable right” and "Life, liberty, property” use the Dec
    6·1 answer
  • Plaintiff definition
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act fit the example of elastic clause
    12·1 answer
  • All elements of an offense have to be proven before someone can be charged with the crime.
    13·1 answer
  • help, please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please ple
    13·1 answer
  • If an employee is injured in an automobile accident while she is driving to an off-premises restaurant during her personal lunch
    8·1 answer
  • Free brainlyest....................
    10·2 answers
  • One of the legal definitions of intoxication in texas
    7·1 answer
  • How did this supreme court decision affect judicial interpretations of the constitution?.
    12·1 answer
  • Why was it important for the Mauritanian government to adopt an adjustment strategy in the year 2000?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!