Answer:
Minimun cost: $2000
Explanation:
We solve for the optimal order size using the
Economic Order Quantity:
<u>Where: </u>
D = annual demand = 2,000 boxes
S= setup cost = ordering cost = $ 100
H= Holding Cost = $10.00
EOQ 200
It should order: 2,000 demand / 200 order size = 10 times
At a cost of 1,000 dollar (100 units x $ 10)
It will face an average inventory of 100 units thus holding cost:
100 units x 10 dollar per unit = 1,000
Total cost: 1,000 + 1,000 = 2,000
Answer:
1. are consistent with decentralization.
2. use the expertise of managers in weighing the costs and benefits of the transfer.
3. preserve the autonomy of the divisions.
Explanation:
A negotiated transfer prices can be defined as the final price reached between the buyer (consumer) of finished goods and services and the trader (seller) of such goods and services.
Negotiated transfer prices has the following advantages;
1. Negotiated transfer prices are consistent with decentralization.
2. Use the expertise of managers in weighing the costs and benefits of the transfer.
3. They preserve the autonomy of the divisions.
Answer:
Correct answer is A, They know how to oversell their product so the customer can't say no. Explanation: Good salespeople are those who sell more and more of their company's product.
Answer: 88.89 or 89
Explanation: Futures contract refers to a legal binding which obligates a buyer and seller to transact about a commodity, good, security or services at a predetermined price but goods are delivered or paid for in the future.
Given the following ;
Portfolio value(p) = $20million
Portfolio Beta (b) = 1.2
Index price (i) = 1080
Multiplier = 250
Future value(A) = index price × multiplier
Future value(A) = 1080 × 250 = 270000
Number of contracts (N) = (portfolio value × portfolio Beta) ÷ future value
N = ($20,000,000×1.2)÷270000
N = 24000000 ÷×270000
N = 88.8888=88.89
N = 89 (NEAREST whole number)