Answer: A. Persian Wheel
Explanation:
A Persian wheel would be best because it is able to satisfy the demands of individual users as opposed to groups. A Persian wheel uses a single well to draw water so would be able to supply a person or people in a deserted area by drawing from individual wells.
Canals and dams on the other hand are best for areas with a lot of people as they would all benefit from the canal supplying multiple farms which would offset the cost of building it in the first place. Building a canal to a single farm is not feasible if it was to supply a single farm.
Utilitarian ethics is a theory suggests that if playing the killer in simulated killing leads to more unhappiness than not doing so, then playing the killer is wrong.
About Utilitarian ethics
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasising results. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest benefit for the largest number of people is the most morally right one. For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide and stay away from vanilla as it will make you unhappy.
Consequentialist, welfareist, impartial, and aggregationist are the four distinguishing traits shared by all ethical systems in the utilitarian family. They consequently place the highest moral priority on advancing everyone's general well-being.
To know more about utilitarianism:
brainly.com/question/29313132
#SPJ4
Answer:
humanism has been at odds with organized religion, specifically with the Roman Catholic Church, which was predominant in the Roman Empire and then in European culture from the Middle Ages on. Humanism is based on liberal principles and a heritage of philosophical thought concerned with ethics.
Explanation:
<span>This suggests that Trey has not yet developed a legitimate understanding of the permanency of tangible objects. This can be evidenced by the fact that Trey lost interest in the ball once it was no longer in his range of sight. He has not yet learned that the object does not just disappear if he is unable to see it.</span>
