<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
<u>When scientists report their results from their scientific investigations, scientists should include the content that answers the following questions</u>
- Was our hypothesis correct?
- Do we need to run experiment again,changing a variable?
- If the results did not support the hypothesis then add information about reason why it happened.
<u>Scientists should not include the following </u>
- It should not oppose your results.
- Conclusions should not be in a negative tone.
Answer:
Smaller populations have a greater chance of having one allele expressed disproportionately.
Explanation:
Genetic drift corresponds to a drastic casual alteration of the natural order, reaching the genotypic concentration of one or several species, not preliminarily involving natural selection factors, but caused by sudden events. Such phenomenon is characterized by the occurrence of ecological catastrophes, for example: earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, floods, burnings, avalanches and other processes, affecting a large population contingent. Thus limiting the genetic content of a particular group, restricted to the prevailing individuals.
In this situation, with low variability, differentiated individuals will experience a more significant selection pressure in relation to the ascending lineage, which minimized the achievements of selection due to the high number of living individuals. In this scenario, smaller populations will have a greater chance of having a disproportionately expressed allele as the number of members is reduced. We can also see this effect if by using a coin we imagine that heads and tails are two alleles in a population and each coin toss represents one member of that population.
Contact forces have a stronger impact on motion, compared to noncontact forces
Penicillin was an accidental discovery I believe
