Answer:
3 and 28
Step-by-step explanation:
note (
)(x ) = 
= 
and
( )(4) = 
= 
= 
= 3
-------------------------------------------------------
(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)
f(x) + g(x)
= x² + 2x - 3 + x² - 9 = 2x² + 2x - 12 and
(f + g)(4) = 2(4)² + 2(4) - 12 = 2(16) + 8 - 12 = 32 + 8 - 12 = 28
Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
Answer: (-1/5, 2/5)
Step-by-step explanation:
See the photo for explanation and work.
Answer:
no, they are equal. we know this because when reducing both they are equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
first find the least common denominator
that's 3
reduce fractions until the denominator is both 3
we get 2/3 and 2/3. the proportions are equal.
Answer:
Which i think is the first one, there may just be a typing error.
Step-by-step explanation:
A polynomial of order n has the following format:
In which a is the leading coefficient, 
are the roots.
If a root appears m times, they are said to have multiplicity m.
Leading coefficient of 1 and roots 21 and 31 with multiplicity 1
So the correct answer is:
Which i think is the first one, there may just be a typing error.
