1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenaWriter [7]
1 year ago
15

Briefly discuss Sherif’s (1966) classic study of boys at summer camp in terms of findings and implications for understanding com

petition.
Business
1 answer:
Serhud [2]1 year ago
5 0

Sherif’s (1966) classic Robbers Cave study of boys at summer camp finds the relationship between the two groups of boys immediately deteriorated when the event began.

In the 1940s and 1950s, social psychologist Muzafer Sherif and his associates conducted a number of investigations, including the Robbers Cave experiment. Sherif investigated the interactions between male groups at summer camps and a competitor group with the hypothesis that "when two groups have competing purposes... their members would become antagonistic to one other even when the groups are constituted of normal well-adjusted individuals at a summer camp " The Robbers Cave study found the incident swiftly escalated once the parties started throwing jabs. The Sherif discovered that the summer camps' surveys, in which they were asked to score their own team and the opposing team on good and bad attributes, contained questions about group animosity.

Learn more about Sherif here:

brainly.com/question/14407858

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
Sarah, the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees. Her boss, Vladimir, instructs her to increase the
Verizon [17]

Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.

We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.

We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.

4 0
3 years ago
Information related to Tamarisk, Inc. is presented below. 1. On April 5, purchased merchandise on account from Culver Company fo
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

Required a

<u>April 5,</u>

Merchandise $38,900 (debit)

Accounts Payable ; Culver Company  $38,900 (credit)

<u>April 6</u>

Freight Cost $800 (debit)

Cash $800 (credit)

<u>April 7</u>

Equipment $39,900 (debit)

Accounts Payable $39,900 (credit)

<u>April 8</u>

Accounts Payable ; Culver Company  $5,000 (debit)

Merchandise $5,000 (credit)

<u>April 15</u>

Accounts Payable ; Culver Company  $33,900 (debit)

Discount Received $678 (credit)

Cash $33,222 (credit)

Required b.

Accounts Payable ; Culver Company  $33,900 (debit)

Cash $33,900 (credit)

Explanation:

When Tamarisk, Inc. paid the balance due to Culver Company on April 15, the payment is made within the discount period. Thus Tamarisk, Inc <em>is granted a discount of 2%</em> and pays the Account at $33,222 (net of credit granted on merchandise previously returned) .

However, when Tamarisk, Inc. paid the balance due to Culver Company on May 4 instead, the payment is made outside the discount period. Thus Tamarisk, Inc is <em>not granted a discoun</em>t  pays the Account in full at  $33,900 (net of credit granted on merchandise previously returned) .

6 0
4 years ago
Reason for a bimodel distribution
DedPeter [7]

The reason for a bimodel distribution is that a bimodal distribution may occasionally result from merging data from two processes or populations.

<h3>What is a bimodel distribution?</h3>
  • Two modes comprise a bimodal distribution. In other words, the results of two distinct processes are integrated into a single collection of data.
  • The distribution sometimes goes by the name "double-peaked." Consider the distribution of production data over two shifts in a manufacturing facility.
  • Bimodal distributions frequently happen as a result of underlying events.
  • A bimodal distribution, for instance, can be seen in the amount of patrons who visit a restaurant each hour because people typically eat out for lunch and dinner.
  • The bimodal distribution is brought on by the underlying human behavior.
  • If a data set has two modes, it is bimodal. This indicates that no particular data value has the highest frequency of occurrence. Instead, the highest frequency is tied between two data values.

Learn more about bimodel distribution here:

brainly.com/question/14971511

#SPJ9

3 0
1 year ago
While waiting in line to buy two tacos at 75 cents each and a medium drink for 80 cents, Jordan notices that the restaurant has
puteri [66]

Answer:

The correct answer is $0,20.

Explanation:

The marginal cost, at each level of concrete production, indicates the costs we incurred in carrying out said production. Basically, it is an indicator that will allow us and help to make decisions regarding the preparation and production of goods and services.

In the previous case, the cost of buying two tacos for $ 75 each plus a $ 80 bedid is as follows:  

Tacos: $ 75 * 2 = $ 1,50

Drink: $ 80

TOTAL = 2,30

For its part, the second option is priced at $ 2,50

Subtracting the results, the marginal cost is defined as follows:

$ 2,50 - $ 2,30 = $ 0,20

6 0
3 years ago
The president of the Micro Brewing Corporation asks you, as the company economist, to forecast changes in consumer beer purchase
umka21 [38]

Answer:

It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.

Explanation:

To determine whether the company should raise the selling price, we need to determine the effect on income. <u>The best option is the one with the higher sales revenue.</u>

Sales revenue= selling price * number of units

<u>Current:</u>

Sales revenue= 5.5*2,200= $12,100

<u>Proposal:</u>

Sales revenue= 7.5*1,800= $13,500

It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Great Southeast ​Company's Cash account shows an ending balance of $ 720. The bank statement shows a $ 26 service charge and an
    9·1 answer
  • Portfolio standard deviation and diversification: You are asked to give financial advice to a mutual fund manager. The fund has
    10·1 answer
  • Number each of the following steps from 1 to 7 to identify the steps needed to reconcile a bank statement. (The model in the pre
    6·1 answer
  • In the context of Camp Bow Wow, which of the following is likely to be affected and shaped by founder Heidi Ganahl's inspiration
    13·1 answer
  • Lower Equitorial and Upper Equitorial are the same except Lower Equitorial has a larger capital stock. Both countries undertake
    9·1 answer
  • My company is exporting a batch of goods in CFR terms. What should I do if the vessel run aground during transportation and part
    11·1 answer
  • Which part of the citation below refers to the publisher?
    5·2 answers
  • The development of cotton and woolen mills in the mill cities of England, and later New England, caused tremendous sociological
    5·1 answer
  • What is the balance between supply and demand called ?
    6·2 answers
  • prepare the journal entry to record double declining balance depreciation expense for the forklify for year 2
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!