Allocation of joint costs in proportion to the value of the output of the sales which were produced in the process during at the split-off point is a preferred approach.
<h3>What are joint costs?</h3>
Joint costs involve the benefit of more than one product, and the separation of the costs of such products is impossible as the benefits related thereto are also joint.
One of the best examples of joint costs is in a condition when a cattle-owner feeds both the flock of sheep and cattle of cows at the same time. One cannot differentiate between the separate costs allocated.
Hence, it may be said that value basis is the most appropriate method for the purpose of allocation of joint costs being incurred in the proportion as it may be.
Learn more about joint costs here:
brainly.com/question/13537893
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
On June 1
Cash A/c Dr $99,000
To Notes payable A/c $99,000
(Being the amount borrowed is recorded)
For recording this transaction, we debited the cash account and credited the notes payable account so that the correct posting can be done
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. The higher the risk, the lower the possible investment.
Explanation:
With regards to speculation, hazard can be characterized as the changeability of return. the contrast between real result and expected result can be called as hazard. In the given model, Sandy think about that there is a positive connection between the likelihood of hazard and returns. for example on the off chance that there is high hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is high. in the event that there is less hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is low.
Right now, likes to go with if the higher the hazard, the lower the potential ventures, in light of the fact that the inconstancy of profits is high. Means the financial specialist could conceivably get the profits, consequently they may like to go with certain and ensured returns than dubious more significant yields. In the region of ventures it is a typical inquiry to all, some may go with higher the hazard the lower the conceivable speculation.
Henceforth, the appropriate response is option D.
In the event that an announcement is there that the higher the hazard, the bigger the potential returns, it doesn't imply that the speculator gets more significant yields with his ventures. the odds are there to get more significant yields simultaneously there are a few issues moreover.
Stock a is $2000. Calculate 10.5% of $2000, which equals $210.
Stock b is $3000. Calculate 14.7% of $3000, which is $441.
The expected return on the portfolio is $210 + $441, which equals $651.
