Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
In option A, Its increase in consumption and GDP is $200.
In option B, Investment decisions increase about $1800, net exports drop by $1800 and therefore GDP should remain constant.
In option C, GDP or investment wasn’t increasing only at present because estimates were produced last year.
In option D, Market growth is $470 million, options trading is rising by $30 million but GDP is growing by $500 million.
GDP is just a misleading indicator, it does not take into account recreation, environmental protection, education and health rates, non-market behaviors, changes in wealth disparity, increases of variety or rises in innovation. HDI's social progress Index could be used to highlight a need for people or their ability to assess national growth as the supreme requirement.
You like to convince people do what you want for the benefit of everyone.
Answer:
Rent-seeking is the effort to increase one's share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. Rent-seeking results in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth-creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality, and potential natoinal decline
Explanation:
Rent-seeking is the effort to increase one's share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. Rent-seeking results in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth-creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality, and potential national decline
Cecil Rhodes co-founded the DE beers mining company and used his power to increase British control of African territory. <span />
Answer:
The current value of a perpetuity is based more on the discounted value of its nearer (in time) cash flows and less by the discounted value of its more distant (in the future) cash flows.
Explanation:
The perpetuities can becalculate as follow
C/rate = Perpetuities
the reasoning behind this formula:
If we calculate limit whe ntime is infite,
because at more time 1 + r gets closer and closer to 0
we get on the dividend
1 - 0
So we have C x 1/i = C/i
Next part would be why the first cash flow is more relevant than the subsequent cash flow:
Here if time increases, then the divisor get closer to ∞ so we have
P ( a constant) /∞ = 0
So the first cashflow is more relevant than the more distant cash flow
