Answer:
Estimated Annual Overhead divided by Estimated Annual Activity Level
Explanation:
The computation of the predetermined overhead rate. The formula is shown below:
Predetermined overhead rate = (Total estimated manufacturing overhead) ÷ (estimated direct labor-hours)
The estimated direct labor hour is a part of the activity level
And, it shows a relationship between the Total estimated manufacturing overhead and the estimated annual activity level
Hence, all other options are wrong
Answer:
a. $140,000
Explanation:
Options are <em>"a. $140,000
, b. $100,000, c. $180,000
, d. $240,000
"</em>
<em />
Capital Account = Fair value of the asset (i.e. Partner's investment is valued on fair value)
Date Account Debit Credit
Building $140,000
Partner's capital $140,000
Option B, I and IV
i.e 102 and 7.50 Net would be considered "fair and reasonable" under MSRB rules.
Explanation:
The dealer buys 6% bonds on an equal footing. When reselling bonds, the premium it receives must be equal and sensible. A price of 104 is equivalent to 4 percent higher than average. This is definitely fairer than just a price of 112, which translates to a mark-up of 12 percent. To receive an "approximate" price for an income-based long-term commitments, break the coupon by the purpose.
There would be an average price of 6.00 cents bid on a 5.75% basis ,
6.00/5.75 = 1.043478 x $1,000 par = $1,043.48.
This is a rational improvement of roughly 4 percent over pair. A 6.00% note, then, would be sold at an average price at a yield of 4.00% of
6.00/4.00 = 1.50 x $1,000 par = $1,500.
This is a 50% improvement over the original, which is completely unreasonable.
Answer:
dealer A:
total interest charged = ($118.28 x 18 months) - $2,000 = $129.04
APR = [($129.04 / $2,000) / 1.5 periods] x 100% = 4.3%
dealer B:
total interest charged = ($70.31 x 36 months) - $2,000 = $531.16
APR = [($531.16 / $2,000) / 3 periods] x 100% = 8.85%
The APR charged by dealer A is much lower than the APR charged by dealer B. Even thought the monthly payments are much lower for dealer B, the total amount of interest charged is much higher.
Answer: $3,580.30 (converted to 2decimal places).
Antwone need to deposit " $3,580.30008” into the account each semi-annual period in order to take his vacation in 2 years
Explanation:
By using compound interest formula below to solve the question
A = p ( 1 + r/n)^nt
A = amount (future value)= $3,800
P = principal (present value) ?
r = annual nominal rate = 3%= 0.03
n = today number of compounding years = semiannually (2 interest payments period in a year) = 2
t = time in years =2
3,800 = p ( 1 + 0.03/2)^2(2)
3,800 = p ( 1 + 0.015 )^4
3,800 = p ( 1.015 ) ^4
3,800 = 1.06136355 p
divide both sides by 1.06136355
p = 3,800 / 1.06136355
p = $3,580.30008
≈$3,580.30 ( rounded off to 2d.p)