Using Tuckman’s stages of group development, we know that Elaine’s group is going through a stage called storming.
In this stage of group development, aside from having difficulties in adjusting to their roles, Elaine’s group and group members would also experience disagreements regarding priorities, tensions between one another, hostility with each other, and there would also be cliques forming inside the group.
Like toys r us it failed because they always had low costs and low profits from their toys.
Answer:
1.90%
Explanation:
There is the accordance or connection between nominal and real interest rates. It is basically possible to convert from nominal interest rates to real interest rates. According to the Fisher, there is a equation that's called the Fisher Equation:
Real interest rate ≈ nominal interest rate − inflation rate.
On our example,
Inflation rate in October- 3.33%
Inflation rate in November- 2.90%
Nominal interest rate in October- 4.75%
Nominal interest rate in November- 4.80%
In October,
Real interest rate=4.75%-3.33%=1.42%
In November,
Real interest rate=4.80%-2.90%=1.90%
As a result, we see that there is 1.90% real interest rate in November and the real interest rate has increased 0.48% in November compared to October.
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $576,900
Explanation:
The budgeted cost of goods sold will be the sales volume in 2020 multiplied by cost per unit .
Sales volume in year 2020= (100-10)% × sales figure for 2019
= 90% × 160,250= 144,225
Cost of goods sold per unit = cost of goods sold in 2019/Sales units in 2019
= 641,000/160250=$4
Cost of goods sold = $4× 144,225 = $576,900
Cost of goods sold = $576,900
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
