<span>This phrase is completely true. We, the human race, have, in our long existence over the earth modified the environment and nature, specially the forest and the grassland through the destruction of them to build residences and comercial buildings, but also to use it for agriculture and to raise kettle</span>
Idn't Spain have more colonies in Africa?
OK. During the era of exploration, the Portuguese were sailing around the coast of Africa and began their colonies in Mozambique, Angola, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde and Sao Tome y Principe. By the 1500's, Spain was preoccupied by explanding their empire in the Americas. Africa was then ignored for centuries before the introduction of quamine, which allowed Europeans to travel inland in Africa without dropping like flies from malaria. Hence, in the 1870's the scramble for Africa began! The British and French, the two largest Western powers of the day, took the most land in Africa. Germany too took colonies...Cameroon, Tanzania, Togo and Namibia were German colonies before WWI. Even Belgium took the Congo (they actually began the Scramble for Africa after circumnaviagting the Congo River). After WWI, they would also take Rwanda and Burundi from the Germans.
Answer:
The idea of restricting international trade, otherwise known as trade protectionism, is considered wrong because the world today is centered around globalisation.
Explanation:
Countries desire to increase revenue for their local governments. They impose trade barriers through the imposition of tariffs, embargos, voluntary export restraints and so on, with the aim of reducing competition from foreign industries so as to promote local companies. However, this usually produces adverse effects, heavier than the intended benefits. Such effects include reducing the wide variety of goods and services available to the population, reducing the number of jobs due to reduction in number of foreign companies, increasing monopoly power which will in turn lead to higher prices being charged by monopolists. Indirectly, restricting international trade also affects international relations.
Because he wanted to be less dependent and did not want to stop with slavery and wanted to keep trade between the U.S.
