Answer:
<em>King </em><em>George</em><em> </em><em>lll </em><em>sent </em><em>British </em><em>soldiers</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>enforce</em><em> </em><em>payment</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>taxes,</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>colonist</em><em> </em><em>sometimes</em><em> </em><em>smuggled </em><em>goods </em><em>into </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>avoid</em><em> </em><em>paying</em><em> taxes</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The </em><em>items </em><em>were </em><em>marked </em><em>with </em><em>a </em><em>stamp </em><em>to </em><em>show </em><em>the </em><em>tax </em><em>was </em><em>paid.</em>
Answer:
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Land $84,000
Common stock $12,000
Paid in capital in excess of par value $72,000
Workings:
Amount of Common stock = Number of shares * Paid in capital per share
= 6,000 shares * $2
= $12,000
Amount of excess of paid in capital = Market value of land - Amount of common stock
= $84,000 - $12,000
= $72,000
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.