Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
Answer:
Jamie Lee should call her credit card company and ask them to stop payment for the television since the company has refused to accept a return of the television.
Explanation:
The Fair Credit Billing Act is a law that protects customers from different types of disputed charges. According to this law an individual has the right to stop the payment of a service he/she is not completely satisfied with.
This law protects a customer from unfair billing practices such as errors in calculation, wrong address. This law only applies to customers that have a credit card. This law is very important because it enables a customer to withhold payment for displeased services.
Answer: $449.53
When Shawna wrote a check for $23.77, the same amount was deducted from her bank account, decreasing her balance to $99.55. When she deposited two checks totaling $349.98, the amount was added, making her new balance increased to $449.53.
Answer:
$86.67 is the profit maximizing price for the monopolist
Explanation:
In order to find the profit maximizing price for the monopolist using its price elasticity and marginal cost we have to use the formula
Price= Marginal cost* (elasticity/elasticity+1)
Marginal cost = $65.0065
Elasticity = -4
Price = 65.0065 *(-4/-4+1) = 65.0065*(-4/-3)= 86.67
The correct answer is B; Taxing the sellers of the product.
Further Explanation:
The seller cannot be taxed for the product. The product makers were already taxed first by the government so they can't tax the product again. Spillover benefits can be both positive and negative.
By taxing the seller of the product the government is not approaching the socially optimal level. Many times the costs of the spillover may affect a third party and can cause extra costs to someone not even directly related to the product.
Learn more about the spillover benefits at brainly.com/question/12263191
#LearnwithBrainly
